Titlebook: Refugees and the Promise of Asylum in Postwar France, 1945–1995; Greg Burgess Book 2019 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 20

膝蓋

arthroplasty

,The OFPRA and Its Refugees, 1952–1960,had fled after the suppression of the 1956 uprising were determined to be refugees before their admission. Few constraints were in their way. France’s demand for workers to fuel its economic expansion assured their ready integration.

書(shū)法

Book 2019 It questions whether France fulfilled the promise of asylum for those persecuted for the ‘cause of liberty’ made in its Constitution of 1946. Post-war development and the demand for immigrant workers were favourable to refugees from the Communist east, from Franco’s Spain, from Hungary after insurr

FLAX

Refugees, Deportees and Repatriates After 1944,gly unrelated responses to foreign nationals before the end of hostilities and into the immediate post-war period. The Provisional Government sought to clarify, through temporary instructions and ordinances, who had a right to remain on French territory and who did not, and the legal conditions that

locus-ceruleus

,The ‘Neo Refugees’ of Spain and the East,ugees again appeared from Spain. They, and refugees who could not be returned to the east or who refused to return, were classified as ‘neo refugees’ by the IGCR to mark them as a new problem of protection.

synovium

Parabola

,The OFPRA and Its Refugees, 1952–1960,e Convention in French law and upholding France’s constitutional promise of asylum. It also surveys the national and socio-economic profiles of the refugee groups for whom it was responsible. While the refugee convention and the law establishing the OFPRA related to individual claims for asylum, pol

狂熱語(yǔ)言

撫慰

脖子

,Asylum in Crisis, 1975–1995,rinciples and traditions of rights in French political culture as they applied to refugees. They were reacting against the increasingly exclusionary tendencies in policies of refugee admission and the recognition of their need for protection. They called this a ‘crisis of asylum’ (.) because neither