Titlebook: Redirecting Human Rights; Facing the Challenge Anna Grear Book 2010 Anna Grear 2010 capitalism.human rights.human rights law.Nation

CLAMP

ineffectual

collateral

Embodied Vulnerability and the Limits of Privatisation: Reconsidering Property and Human Rights,ed vulnerability as the foundation of human rights would indicate that corporations should not be accepted as an appropriate human rights beneficiary or be viewed as a human rights victim. That argument was explicitly made in Chapter 2, in the context of addressing arguments made by Addo in favour o

誘騙

Some Brief Conclusory Thoughts and Future Research Directions,ly human rights, is deeply troubling and has potentially very dark implications for the capacity of human rights discourse to protect human beings and communities in an age of increased vulnerability and risk. Moreover, this vulnerability most profoundly and negatively affects precisely those human

木訥

Book 2010ear interrogates the complex tendencies within law that are implicated in the emergence of ‘corporate humanity‘. Grear presents a critical account of legal subjectivity, linking it with law‘s intimate relationship with liberal capitalism in order to suggest law‘s special receptivity to the corporate

一罵死割除

A Genealogy of Quasi-Disembodiment in International Human Rights Law,rguably the paradigmatic legal person, both structurally and ideologically. The structural and ideological advantage of the corporate form over the human being in legal rationality accordingly provides an important critical backdrop for understanding the receptivity of human rights law to corporate human rights claims.

FICE

分離

Human Rights under Pressure?,ial to grasp the seriousness of pressures facing international human rights law through the development of corporate human rights discourse. In order to do this, we need to locate corporate human rights discourse within the matrix of contemporary globalisation.

lobster

2947-8847 m, Anna Grear interrogates the complex tendencies within law that are implicated in the emergence of ‘corporate humanity‘. Grear presents a critical account of legal subjectivity, linking it with law‘s intimate relationship with liberal capitalism in order to suggest law‘s special receptivity to the

Incompetent