Titlebook: Realism and Anti-Realism in the Philosophy of Science; Robert S. Cohen,Risto Hilpinen,Qiu Renzong Book 1996 Springer Science+Business Medi

Outspoken

簡略

How to Know What Rises Up is the Moon? — On the Concept of Realism and the Irrelevancy of Quantum Meefer only to the literature such as [4, 5, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 25, 26, 27], but this list is far from complete. Much of the debate involves the problem of realism vs. antirealism in science which might be said to be an important issue in the frontier of contemporary philosophy of

TEN

The Reality of Thirdness — A Potential-Pragmatic Account of Laws of Naturedual or the species? Anti-realism claims that reality consists of individual, singular, actually existing things, while realism seeks the most essential element of reality in the universal. Thus, when the question arises as to the character of laws of nature, anti-realists can find no place for a re

歌曲

Tentative Realismson is a realist. [Little observation is needed to conclude that all other animals are realists also. The biological evolution of humans was possible only because their physiological organisms were adapted to sensing and responding to real environmental beings and processes.]

漂亮才會豪華

JAMB

Phenomenaes the proof of the Pythagorean theorem in Euclid’s .. We can stare at it for days and still not see that the theorem is true; we need a proof. The common view of diagrams in mathematics is this: they provide a heuristic aide, a help to the imagination when following a proof. Diagrams cannot justify

pulse-pressure

There are No Antirealists in the Laboratory as many variants of these positions as there are adherents of them, I shall adopt, and defend, Bas van Fraassen’s characterization of realism, “Science aims to give us, in its theories, a literally true story of what the world is like; and acceptance of a scientific theory involves the belief that

HEAVY

Can Theories of Chemistry Provide an Argument Against Realism?wer of the new quantum mechanics, yet it was difficult to see how this newly developing explanatory framework would be assimilated into the chemists’ culture. Many chemists were apprehensive that such an assimilation might bring lasting, and not altogether welcome, changes to their culture. But for

Affection

反抗者

Science as Ideologye pursuit of knowledge of universal and necessary truths about the world for its own sake; if there is any interest that should motivate theoretical inquiry, it is the interest in knowing, nothing else. Aristotelian defenders of science will therefore eschew and debunk as ideology1 any cognitive ent