找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Reading George Grant in the 21st Century; Tyler Chamberlain Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exclusive lic

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: 預(yù)兆前
21#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 07:18:16 | 只看該作者
22#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 11:29:18 | 只看該作者
23#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 12:15:41 | 只看該作者
24#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 15:54:13 | 只看該作者
Technology as Empire: George Grant and Russell Kirk on American Conservatism, Grant saw a dissolvent of the traditional virtues. Where Kirk saw American liberty as enabling virtue, Grant saw an inversion of their proper ordering. Hence, Grant might conclude that even this professed anti-liberal American Tory could not escape—or even recognize—his own liberalism.
25#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 20:22:04 | 只看該作者
Only (a) God Can Save Us: Grant and Heidegger’s Competing Responses to Technological Nihilismsary, turning to the purely immanent gods of the fatherland—without the possibility of an appeal to the transcendent or eternal—threatens to exacerbate rather than counter the nihilism at the heart of modernity.
26#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 01:21:58 | 只看該作者
27#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 08:11:33 | 只看該作者
George Grant and the Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic: The Triumph of Technology?iological survival. Consequently, the pursuit of the most efficient means of slowing the spread of Coronavirus confirmed many of Grant’s concerns about how technology can prevent us from reasoning about moral issues.
28#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 09:00:44 | 只看該作者
Between the Pincers: George Grant and the Crisis of Totalitarianismnism and is led to adopt ill-considered political views. In an era where we are confronted once again by the alternative between despotism and parliamentary government, reflecting on Grant’s apparent indifference to the contest between liberal democracy and totalitarianism reminds us of the perils of failing to take the political seriously.
29#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 12:52:19 | 只看該作者
30#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 17:12:54 | 只看該作者
Still Lamenting? Canada, Grantian Conservatism in the Twenty-first Century, and the Paradoxes of Grathe hope that Grant calls us to may be in these new local and regional particularities instead. This chapter offers a reassessment of Grant’s central claims in this light, and reapplies his core and still valuable insights in a contemporary neo-Grantian account of Canada and Canadian conservatism.
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-7 00:09
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
锦屏县| 油尖旺区| 叙永县| 两当县| 那曲县| 堆龙德庆县| 集贤县| 南宁市| 临颍县| 长子县| 韶山市| 康平县| 三江| 常宁市| 鹿泉市| 许昌市| 长阳| 平邑县| 惠州市| 镇沅| 萝北县| 洪江市| 乐都县| 信宜市| 塔城市| 根河市| 太和县| 宜阳县| 宜都市| 平江县| 双牌县| 内乡县| 古丈县| 哈巴河县| 天门市| 澎湖县| 潮州市| 宜都市| 云和县| 福清市| 平湖市|