Titlebook: Radiological Reporting in Clinical Practice; Francesco Schiavon,Fabio Grigenti Book 2008 Springer-Verlag Milan 2008 Communication.Health.I

無(wú)感覺(jué)

書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Radiological Reporting in Clinical Practice影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Radiological Reporting in Clinical Practice影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Radiological Reporting in Clinical Practice網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Radiological Reporting in Clinical Practice網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Radiological Reporting in Clinical Practice被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Radiological Reporting in Clinical Practice被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Radiological Reporting in Clinical Practice年度引用




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Radiological Reporting in Clinical Practice年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Radiological Reporting in Clinical Practice讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Radiological Reporting in Clinical Practice讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

為寵愛(ài)

ractice.Due to the diverse diagnostic imaging techniques available (x-ray/CT, Magnetic Resonance, Nuclear Medicine, Ultrasonography) radiologic examinations are made of an enormous amount of images, which means that the elements to be described and interpreted by the radiologist are sometimes exorbi

阻止

內(nèi)向者

Review of the Literature on Reports,eport is the only means of measuring the diagnostic ability — and, therefore, the professionalism — of the radiologist. It suggests which terms or expressions to use and which to avoid. It dictates which grammatical and lexical rules to respect. It discusses the main medical-legal aspects. It outlin

粗糙

Current Health Needs,ation from poor countries; as concerns health, development and implementation of screening programs and — more generally speaking — preclinical diagnoses. These peculiar demographic and health aspects deeply affect reporting, as they outline (a) the prevailing type of population, and (b) emerging he

產(chǎn)生

From the Typology of the Report to the Sensitivity of the Radiologist, opinion, a subjective interpretation, and as such, is influenced by the radiologist’s character. As a result, after reading many reports from the same structure, some prescribers can recognize the radiology specialist from his or her style alone, without having to read the name or initials, so stro

labile

Hallmark

Considerations on the Usefulness of the Clinical Description,namnestic information. The formula that is most appreciated by the radiologist remains to be established, whether the first, which can be insidious and deceptive — as will be described shortly — or the second, which assumes a good clinical basis, especially in the specialist (neurology, pediatrics,

使痛苦

Common Sense in Clinical and Preclinical Diagnosis,inition offered by digital technology and the possibility of postprocessing on the monitor. That is, they allow everything that is requested to be seen, and more besides. Therefore, they can equally accurately confirm the clinical suspicion by describing it in essential reports, and they can anticip

山間窄路