Titlebook: Radicalism and Revolution in Britain 1775-1848; Essays in Honour of Michael T. Davis Book 2000 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan

Sediment

書目名稱Radicalism and Revolution in Britain 1775-1848影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Radicalism and Revolution in Britain 1775-1848影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Radicalism and Revolution in Britain 1775-1848網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Radicalism and Revolution in Britain 1775-1848網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Radicalism and Revolution in Britain 1775-1848被引頻次




書目名稱Radicalism and Revolution in Britain 1775-1848被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Radicalism and Revolution in Britain 1775-1848年度引用




書目名稱Radicalism and Revolution in Britain 1775-1848年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Radicalism and Revolution in Britain 1775-1848讀者反饋




書目名稱Radicalism and Revolution in Britain 1775-1848讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

鋼筆記下懲罰

,‘Rural War’ and the Missing Revolution in Early Nineteenth-century England, across the ideological divides of Regency and Victorian historiography. The question has even figured prominently in the work of historians of conservative methodologies, including some who probably would not defend counter-factual or ‘virtual’ history in other contexts..

罐里有戒指

and re-examines the threats and ideas of revolution and the byzantine networks and character of British radical culture in the turbulent and intriguing years between 1775 and 1848.978-1-349-41008-8978-0-230-50938-2

爭吵加

narcotic

,‘The Friends of America’: British Sympathy with the American Revolution,and fundamentally in their understanding of the liberties of British subjects and their interpretation of the British constitution. What can reasonably be regarded as a civil war within the British Atlantic empire in the later eighteenth century was not simply a conflict in which two British peoples

巨頭

paroxysm

,John Thelwall’s Political Ambivalence: Reform and Revolution,ved in their study of ., this movement’s intentions were ‘invariably open to misinterpretation, unintentional or deliberate’.. There were times when reform seemed to mean revolution, not just to overly anxious governments but to the reformers themselves. Thomis and Holt nicely capture the nature of

GEON

,Wondering about Wonders: Paine, Constancio and ,, 1794–97,mself to be, and against the opinion of all his adversaries, a relentless defender of the cause of truth which, he asserted, could never be injured by fair discussion. This declaration was prompted due to the probable effects of the prosecution filed against Richard Carlile for publishing Thomas Pai

不愿

follicle