Titlebook: Queer Theories; Donald E. Hall Textbook 2003Latest edition The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2003 exceptionalliterature.bibl

責(zé)任

antidepressant

Who and What is “Queer”?hrough the millennia and across the globe would be reductive indeed. And as we turn now to the last two decades of the twentieth century, we see an unprecedented jumble of both oppressive and progressive activities across Anglo-American society, and a sometimes muted, sometimes deafening cacophony o

時(shí)代

charisma

The Queerness of “The Yellow Wall-Paper” fundamental question of what texts or sorts of texts lend themselves to queer analysis. Are some poems, short stories, novels, etc. appropriate and others inappropriate for this particular avenue of interpretation and theoretical investigation? As with many of the questions that queer theories gene

表示問(wèn)

Queering the Self: queer analysis.” That is true is several ways. Certainly the multidimensionality of the text as it appears on the page (in the case of a literary text) would involve its relationship to both a social context and one of previous literary and nonliterary articulations. That multidimensionality would a

Asperity

Reading for Excess: The Queer Texts of ,, and discussed earlier. In raising the possibility of the rubric of the “queer text” I want to remind (and, of course, remember) that it is just as vital to discuss always the limitations of such a rubric (and, indeed, the project of rubric-building), as it is to discuss its parameters and utilities. Ev

Hemodialysis

Afterword: W(h)ither Identity?s. And perhaps the most intriguing question of them all is the one that is clearly most unanswerable: “What does the future hold?” It is a question that will be answered, of course, in ways that some of us will witness firsthand (in the short run, at least) but that will obviously elude all of this

災(zāi)難

重畫(huà)只能放棄

Introduction: What “Queer Theories” Can do for Youogical limitations. For readers expecting or insisting upon a guide to mastering “queer theory,” this book will inevitably disappoint. For those who are willing to allow — or perhaps even to embrace — diversity, partiality, and the impossibility of comprehensiveness, this book may provide useful information and even a few pleasures.

難取悅