Titlebook: Quantum Reality, Relativistic Causality, and Closing the Epistemic Circle; Essays in Honour of Wayne C. Myrvold,Joy Christian Book 2009 Sp

Nostalgia

全部逛商店

The Transient ,otivations for the view I propose, and I consider five objections that might be raised against it. For instance, one general objection to the notion of the “flow” or passing of time is that one can not answer the natural question ‘How fast does time “flow” or pass?’ I claim that Minkowski spacetime provides a natural answer to this question.

SLING

Is There a Relation Between the Breakdown of the Superposition Principle and an Indeterminacy in the of the center of mass (c.m.) of a macroscopic body microscopically small, whereas the indeterminacy of the position of a microparticle may be, and often is macroscopic. The mechanism of the observation-independent decay of a superposition of droplet-tracks in a cloud chamber is also presented.

Intrepid

盡忠

Passion at a Distancecal systems [1]. It is neither the local causality of pushes, pulls, and central forces familiar from classical mechanics and electrodynamics, nor the non-local causality of instantaneous or just superluminal action at a distance that would spell trouble for relativity theory. This mode of connectio

獨裁政府

Cougar

Newton’s Methodologylast century. These enrichments focus on theory-mediated measurements of theoretical parameters by phenomena. It is argued that this richer methodology of Newton‘s informs a pre-relativity response to the Mercury perihelion problem, endorses the transition from Newton‘s theory to Einstein‘s, and con

invulnerable

homeostasis

Bohr and the Photontil the mid-1920s, when experiments forced a change in his outlook. Exchanges with Einstein during this period contributed to the development of Bohr‘s concept of complementarity and subsequently, he recognized the role of the photon concept in describing one of the complementary aspects of electrom

painkillers

Interpretations of Probability in Quantum Mechanics: A Case of “Experimental Metaphysics”s theorem (and successors), we concentrate on clarifying the meaning and status of “objective probability” in quantum mechanics. The terms “objective” and “subjective” are found ambiguous and inadequate, masking crucial differences turning on the question of what the numerical values of probability