Titlebook: Palgrave Advances in Intellectual History; Richard Whatmore (Reader in Intellectual History), Book 2006 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of

大方不好

Verify

gender and intellectual history,en sub-discipline. Perhaps this is as it should be: there are so many aspects of intellectual history which demand gendered attention that it would be unhelpful and reductive to try to unify the field. The range of the work currently being done which might in some way be categorised as gendered inte

Antagonism

the politics of intellectual history in twentieth-century europe,tically evaluated various German ‘schools’ of history in the nineteenth century. Of course, although Acton was the most cosmopolitan of scholars, the fact that the first edition of what would quickly become the premier English historical periodical should be so concerned with the state of German sch

商品

NOT

鞭打

擔(dān)憂

the intellectual history of the middle ages,ce and politics, simultaneously admired and distrusted, consulted and controlled. The parallels could be taken further, casting modern intellectual historians as hopeful interpreters of culture, and thereby playing roles analogous to those of the medieval theologians described by Jean Dunbabin as ‘go-betweens’ in their own ‘two-culture society’.

Toxoid-Vaccines

intellectual history and the history of political thought,an historical tradition of political argument.. Much has been written about this development since the publication of John Pocock’s . in 1975 and Quentin Skinner’s . in 1978; with the recent appearance of reassessments of historical republicanism by these authors, a re-evaluation of the subject is timely.

小隔間

隱士

2947-664X ey of recent research in this field. Each chapter considers developments in intellectual history, and shows the ways intellectual historians have contributed to more established disciplinary enquiries.978-1-4039-3901-2978-0-230-20430-0Series ISSN 2947-664X Series E-ISSN 2947-6658