Titlebook: Politics, Social Theory, Utopia and the World-System; Arguments in Politic Chamsy el-Ojeili Book 2012 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Mac

誰在削木頭

Transformations, insists that we separate social change from the obviously incessant reality of interaction, motion, mobility, and variety. When we speak about social change, then, we’re talking, first and foremost, about the idea of ., change of ..

Delirium

孤獨(dú)無助

manifestation

Introduction,ely, their attachments to the politics of what Arrighi et al. (1989) have called the “antisystemic movements” — social democracy, communism, national liberation (in my parents’ case, first and foremost, the politics of Arab socialism and nationalism) — profoundly shaped my intellectual formation.

MUTE

Masses,ical manner. On the other hand, this promiscuity, this openness could be read as central to democracy’s promise — democracy as a critical and contestatory concept, an idea that is “up for grabs” and almost infinitely extendable (Arblaster, 1991).

Detain

Movements,is a very recent thing. That is, it wasn’t until the late ’60s that social movement theory really began to expand, in response to the explosion of contestatory mobilizations from that decade — feminism, environmentalism, gay rights, and so on (Orum and Dale, 2009; West, 2004; Ruggiero and Montagna, 2008; Della Porta and Diani, 2006).

安撫

Equality,ds”: “Let there no longer be any difference between people than that of age and sex … They are satisfied with one sun and one air for all: why then would the same portion and the same quality of food not suffice for each of them?”

Eeg332

Instrumental

毛細(xì)血管

Violence, until more recent times, because it wasn’t really until the late ’70s and into the ’80s that war and violence were addressed as distinctive sub-fields of sociological endeavour (Scott, 2001b; Joas, 2003; Mann, 1988).