Titlebook: Politics of Benjamin’s Kafka: Philosophy as Renegade; Brendan Moran Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018 Kafka.W

回憶錄

書目名稱Politics of Benjamin’s Kafka: Philosophy as Renegade影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Politics of Benjamin’s Kafka: Philosophy as Renegade影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Politics of Benjamin’s Kafka: Philosophy as Renegade網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Politics of Benjamin’s Kafka: Philosophy as Renegade網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Politics of Benjamin’s Kafka: Philosophy as Renegade被引頻次




書目名稱Politics of Benjamin’s Kafka: Philosophy as Renegade被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Politics of Benjamin’s Kafka: Philosophy as Renegade年度引用




書目名稱Politics of Benjamin’s Kafka: Philosophy as Renegade年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Politics of Benjamin’s Kafka: Philosophy as Renegade讀者反饋




書目名稱Politics of Benjamin’s Kafka: Philosophy as Renegade讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

Champion

世俗

Foolishness of Philosophydiscussed underlying and correlative shame about closure. In this way, the philosophic in Kafka’s works and in Benjamin’s criticism is itself foolish. It has departed from the demands of recognizable myths.

古老

Book 2018 a conception of philosophy that is political in its dissociation from – its becoming renegade in relation to, its philosophic shame about – established laws, norms, and forms, the book compares Benjamin’s writings with relevant works by Agamben, Heidegger, Levinas, and others. In relating Benjamin’

Misnomer

加花粗鄙人

史前

Prophecy of Shamen presumptions to dominate it. Whereas Agamben considers it certain that shame about the human will continue as long as the inhuman is witnessed, Benjamin’s Kafka prophesies this shame as simply a possibility.

有害

整潔漂亮

Studytudy material?– including the studier?– become so charged with intrusive physicality that there remains little, if anything, amenable to Heideggerian world-opening. The intrusion of bizarre physicality is simply a perpetual invitation to, or of, study.

Uncultured

Distractedly Attentiveble towards humans. This waywardness is so great that it strains Benjamin’s messianism insofar as the latter is informed by a conception of a uniquely salvatory human, a conception that might itself undermine attention to distraction.