Titlebook: Political Settlements in Divided Societies; Consociationalism an Christalla Yakinthou Book 2009 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan

charity

書目名稱Political Settlements in Divided Societies影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Political Settlements in Divided Societies影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Political Settlements in Divided Societies網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Political Settlements in Divided Societies網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Political Settlements in Divided Societies被引頻次




書目名稱Political Settlements in Divided Societies被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Political Settlements in Divided Societies年度引用




書目名稱Political Settlements in Divided Societies年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Political Settlements in Divided Societies讀者反饋




書目名稱Political Settlements in Divided Societies讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

Palatial

https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230246874conflict; Institution; politics

隱藏

Hemodialysis

Narrative

Introduction,m the mid-1950s when the Greek Cypriots founded anti-British and pro-Greek EOKA. (Cyprus had been a British colony, gaining its independence in 1960) until the country’s . partition in 1974. The most significant crises occurred in 1963–4, when the power-sharing government collapsed as a result of po

使人入神

Consociationalism in Theory and Practice,ratic governance in deeply divided polities. This work seeks to understand why elites in Cyprus have been thus far unprepared to share power. As a first step in this project, the present chapter will examine whether the body of ‘consociational’ ideas, on which efforts at a political settlement have

forebear

Cypriot History(ies) as the Foundation of Modern Reunification Politics, the insights of historical institutionalism to establish links between Cyprus’ modern history, group memory, and major areas of friction which inhibit elite co-operation. It will show how agreement on a power-sharing solution in Cyprus has been inhibited by the development of a single major cleavag

reserve

Harbor

Getting the Institutions Right: Making Plans for Cyprus,ely upon information from interviews with involved parties, reports, and other primary sources, the chapter argues that the Annan Plan was carefully and methodically constructed to create a state which addressed both groups’ primary concerns and fears as well as their most important demands. Much of

obsolete