Titlebook: Political Science in the Shadow of the State; Research, Relevance, Rainer Eisfeld,Matthew Flinders Book 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable)

Charitable

fledged

Myelin

Book 2021ing-out’ of democracy include a focus on the changing governance of higher education? Offering the first comparative analysis of how both democratic and autocratic politicians are seeking to control the research funding landscape, this book reveals a very worrying shift in the relationships between

Hyperlipidemia

From Deference and?the Politicization of Research Funding to a New Politics of Political Sciencee of ideas and through this to “speak truth unto power” is not just the lifeblood of universities, but also of democracies. The paradox we have attempted to bring to the fore is therefore the manner in which neoliberalism has furthered .liberalism. The result is a dangerous fraying at the borderline between democracy and authoritarianism.

倔強(qiáng)一點(diǎn)

Commonplace

Towards a Tyranny of Politically Selected Relevance? Co-option Through State-Directed Research Funding offers a powerful defence of scholarly selected relevance. A conceptual ‘pentagon’ has come to prevail in the governance of academe, in general, and in relation to research funding, in particular. Its component elements are identified as (i) ‘marketized’ or ‘entrepreneurial’ universities, (ii) acco

DALLY

Research in a Racially Structured State: The Role of the US National Science Foundationreform, the agency’s legislation was designed with the social sciences ‘permitted but not required’. Due to the political constraints within which the NSF was created, there was no place for direct research on race and racial discrimination. From the outset, political science was structurally disadv

闡明

Chagrin

The Unplanned and Underfunded Co-option of Political Science in Franceized state, where expertise is mostly generated in-house by career civil servants trained in the .. Case studies show that, to escape that fate, political scientists permit governments to frame debates and research according to their own agendas and priorities. The chapter argues that this allows th

indignant