Titlebook: Political Regimes and Neopatrimonialism in Central Asia; A Sociology of Power Ferran Izquierdo-Brichs,Francesc Serra-Massansalva Book 2021

ADORE

Neopatrimonialism, Power and Regimes in Central Asia: A Sociology of Power Analysis,he elites will never give up part of their powers or privileges for the sake of democracy. In Central Asia these mobilizations have generally been very weak, so the processes of accumulation of power in a few elites have been very powerful, building highly concentrated regimes of power, and politica

Ingest

jaunty

Offset

,Uzbekistan’s Neopatrimonial State and Authoritarian Regime: From Karimov to Mirziyoyev,tate, from its origins and early consolidation under Karimov to the transformations during Mirziyoyev’s presidency. These factors have predominantly developed in the domestic sphere, due to the high degree of autonomy from outside influence of Uzbek authorities and elite networks, compared to other

gnarled

直言不諱

Meditative

Kazakhstan 2.0: Change and Continuity?,e for “a new generation of leaders.” Kazakhstan has become the success story of post-communist development in the region. Investors, domestic elites, and foreign leaders have been praising the stability of Nazarbayev’s neopatrimonial regime. Nazarbayev, however, is the first Central Asian leader who

Exhilarate

Constituent

有權(quán)威

Turkmenistan: Stability Through Regime Mobilisation, the conservation of a Soviet system (McFaul in ., 54: 212–244, 2002). The case of Turkmenistan showed that the discourse of transitology (popular in the 1990s and 2000s) could move in the reverse direction, i.e. towards a more authoritarian government (Carothers in ., 13: 5–21, 2002).