Titlebook: Political Ontology and International Political Thought; Voiding a Pluralist Vassilios Paipais Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and

裹住

Vassilis Paipaiserally create a good effect, but what they express is so vague, so ill-defined — each party or school having such different and even contradictory ideas about them — that it would be good to come to terms with the worth and the meaning of several of these words, so as not to be too incoherent. Among

顛簸下上

scrutiny

PATRI

Depoliticisation in Liberal and Post-liberal Ontologiesrsement of liberal universalism or a surrender to some form of relativistic particularism that denies engagement with the other. These approaches are symptomatic of how even ‘hard’ cases that seek either to defend the liberal values of tolerance, pluralism and the recognition of difference from a va

向下

受傷

maudtin

From Stasis to Tragedy: Ontology and Phenomenology of Political Differenceising logic of foundationalism from within without falling back to an abstract exteriority or a ‘false’ transcendence and, thus, clearing the ground for a non-ideological treatment of pluralism. Such a void ontology rests on the difference between politics and the political as the double lack (stasi

inhumane

Traversing the Fantasy and the ‘Morning After’: From Political Ontology to Theopolitical Meontologytragic subjectivity (that this chapter reads as a phenomenology of the Lacanian drive). Messianic nihilism in this chapter is approached through the work of Walter Benjamin as well as through contemporary philosophical approaches to St Paul’s meontological messianism. This chapter is critical to wha

專橫

Epilogue: The Politics of (Im)pure Criticismn this book. It recapitulates the book’s main points and bears out the implications of the reconceptualisation of political subjectivity as a tragicomic embodiment of a theopolitical meontology. Political action in a diverse world should not abandon the pretensions to universality but, rather, it sh

好忠告人