找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Political Legitimacy beyond Weber; An Analytical Framew Benno Netelenbos Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016 pol

[復制鏈接]
查看: 32002|回復: 35
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 18:09:08 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Political Legitimacy beyond Weber
副標題An Analytical Framew
編輯Benno Netelenbos
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/751/750190/750190.mp4
概述an alternative theory of political legitimation from the citizen’s point.of view and updates Weber’s work for the 21st.Analyses politics respectively in terms of domination, conflict, coordination and
圖書封面Titlebook: Political Legitimacy beyond Weber; An Analytical Framew Benno Netelenbos Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016 pol
描述.Legitimacy is an essential conceptin politics. But what is it? This book seeks to answer this question throughadopting Weber’s sociological approach to legitimacy. Weber argues that weshould not only understand legitimacy from the perspective of the politicalorder, but that we should also look at its subjective meaning. If this approachseems to have fallen into discredit since Weber formulated it almost a centuryago, Netelenbos argues that we need to bring back the subjective into politicalsociology and theory. ..Political Legitimacy beyondWeber. argues that contemporary politics inlate-modern society cannot merely be understood in terms of legitimatedomination or formal bureaucratic organisation. Politics is also aboutstrategic conflict, coordination and argumentation. Based upon thesedifferent conceptualisations of politics andby critically evaluating some of the most leading sociologies, Netelenbospresents four analytical perspectives of political legitimacy. Providingcrucial insights into the multiple dimensions of political legitimacy, thiswill be an essential tool for both empirical and normative research..
出版日期Book 2016
關鍵詞politics; Max Weber; political sociology; Dramaturgy; Public Argumentation; sociology; conflict; domination
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55112-2
isbn_softcover978-1-349-71567-1
isbn_ebook978-1-137-55112-2
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Political Legitimacy beyond Weber影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Political Legitimacy beyond Weber影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Political Legitimacy beyond Weber網(wǎng)絡公開度




書目名稱Political Legitimacy beyond Weber網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Political Legitimacy beyond Weber被引頻次




書目名稱Political Legitimacy beyond Weber被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Political Legitimacy beyond Weber年度引用




書目名稱Political Legitimacy beyond Weber年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Political Legitimacy beyond Weber讀者反饋




書目名稱Political Legitimacy beyond Weber讀者反饋學科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 22:35:19 | 只看該作者
https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55112-2politics; Max Weber; political sociology; Dramaturgy; Public Argumentation; sociology; conflict; domination
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 00:36:15 | 只看該作者
978-1-349-71567-1The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 05:44:40 | 只看該作者
Introduction, the social sciences in general. Furthermore, it is not just of theoretical or scientific interest. Legitimacy is first and foremost a political interest. Politicians and authorities are constantly trying to legitimise their decisions and actions or the structures of political power in general. If s
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 11:25:29 | 只看該作者
Politics as Domination,logical and historical processes that generate a belief in legitimacy—subjective feelings of obligation and duty. Not only is Weber’s work still relevant in itself, it also structures much of the contemporary debate, as its theoretical framework forms the background—implicitly or explicitly—of many
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 15:39:23 | 只看該作者
Politics as Conflict,ferent from scientific, moral, aesthetic, or economic judgements, to the extent that there is no single value that rules over politics. Indeed, where consensus exists or ‘where reason claims to speak, politics is silent’ (Barber 1988:205). Politics, then, is to deal with conflicting values, the ‘war
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 20:28:29 | 只看該作者
Politics as Coordination,ue spheres with their own specific values and logics. It is this latter perspective that is picked up by the third generation of system theory. However, this type of system theory, mostly developed by Luhmann, discards Weber’s action theory. Luhmann is outright hostile and dismissive of the ‘subject
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 23:48:15 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 03:11:03 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 07:40:47 | 只看該作者
Benno Netelenbos Stelle eine Unterscheidung der Begriffe Konzeption und Konzept als sinnvoll, um die Intension des vorliegenden Kapitels darzulegen. Im Gegensatz zu einer Konzeption charakterisiert sich ein Konzept durch seine Ausrichtung an einer Leitidee bzw. an einem Leitbild sowie einem induktiv aus Erfahrungs-
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2026-1-17 16:26
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
军事| 桐梓县| 永济市| 庆城县| 阳江市| 满洲里市| 怀仁县| 唐河县| 手游| 白沙| 北流市| 新绛县| 九江县| 汤原县| 丰宁| 靖安县| 江华| 西充县| 滦平县| 开平市| 伊通| 微博| 临漳县| 东兴市| 白水县| 鄂托克旗| 东丽区| 永州市| 周至县| 安图县| 自治县| 大方县| 疏勒县| 交口县| 博爱县| 都江堰市| 德钦县| 墨玉县| 鸡西市| 栾川县| 商河县|