Titlebook: Political Asylum Deceptions; The Culture of Suspi Carol Bohmer,Amy Shuman Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018 Po

VER

書目名稱Political Asylum Deceptions影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Political Asylum Deceptions影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Political Asylum Deceptions網(wǎng)絡公開度




書目名稱Political Asylum Deceptions網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Political Asylum Deceptions被引頻次




書目名稱Political Asylum Deceptions被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Political Asylum Deceptions年度引用




書目名稱Political Asylum Deceptions年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Political Asylum Deceptions讀者反饋




書目名稱Political Asylum Deceptions讀者反饋學科排名

賞錢

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67404-9Political Asylum; Culture of Suspicion; Asylum seekers; Asylum Fraud; Beatrice Munyenyezi; Victim of pers

CLAY

強所

cogitate

Science and Technology as a Way of Determining Credibility,ppropriate in asylum claims. The body is also increasingly used as evidence, for example, scars resulting from torture, which increasingly require additional documentation, and the requirement for additional certificates or other authoritative expertise has served to shift what counts as truth and evidence in the asylum process.

Landlocked

哪有黃油

tive theoretical framework.This book explores the legitimacy of political asylum applications in the US and UK through an examination of the varieties of evidence, narratives, and documentation with which they are assessed.? Credibility is the central issue in determining the legitimacy of political

Capture

Kinetic

Flat-Feet

Documentary Evidence, absence of documents) only exacerbates a situation already complicated by this lack of standardization, the risk applicants take in acquiring or traveling with documents, and the motivation to use fraudulent documents in life-or-death situations.