Titlebook: Political Animals; Animal Protection Po Robert Garner Book 1998 Robert Garner 1998 Institution.networks.parliament.Policy.politics.reforms

錢財(cái)

罐里有戒指

QUAIL

The Politics of Animal Research in the United States,he existence of a pluralistic issue network rather than a closed policy community. What this chapter will seek to show, however, is that this very pluralistic structure has appeared, more often than not, to blunt the edges of reform thereby thwarting the will of Congress and a concerned public.

fatty-streak

Book 1998ion of animal rights objectives. Much less protection is afforded to animals in the United States, however, largely as a consequence of the particular policy networks within which animal welfare decisions are made.

SHRIK

the adoption of animal rights objectives. Much less protection is afforded to animals in the United States, however, largely as a consequence of the particular policy networks within which animal welfare decisions are made.978-0-333-73000-3978-1-349-26438-4

AER

調(diào)味品

Lobbying for Animals,ement’s adversaries, a set of categories similar to those adopted in Chapter 2 is utilized. That is, following a raw count of the groups involved, an attempt is made to identify the most important and influential groups, examine their organizational resources and establish the degree of sectorization evident in their working practices.

hermetic

The Politics of Farm Animal Welfare in Britain, community.. The incorporation of farmers occurred immediately after the Second World War, when the NFU’s privileged position was enshrined in the 1947 Agriculture Act which introduced a system of guaranteed prices for agricultural products and provided a statutory right for the NFU to be consulted by MAFF on policies affecting its interests.

背景

chastise

American Legislators and Animal Protection,eral role of Congress in animal protection decision-making is considered further in Chapters 7 and 10. This chapter is limited to an examination of the characteristics of those members of Congress who have displayed an interest in animal protection issues in the period 1985–1994.