找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Overlooking Conventions; The Trouble With Lin Michael Devitt Book 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2021 Semantics vs Pragmatics.What is

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: Ford
11#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 10:14:29 | 只看該作者
,Bach and Neale on “What Is Said”,is the content of her intention . a property of the utterance itself. He sees no theoretical role for utterance meanings. In contrast, my theory is committed to utterances, and their expression-tokens, having meanings. I present three reasons for this position. (i) The most basic task for a theory o
12#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 17:49:00 | 只看該作者
Confusion of the Metaphysics of Meaning with the Epistemology of Interpretation,doing so is not a “mere confusion”; the topics are “inextricably linked”. I argue that their reasons for thinking this are flawed. (A) At most they demonstrate an evidential impact of epistemic on metaphysical determination. (B) There is no reason to believe that what a hearer can figure out about w
13#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 18:35:01 | 只看該作者
14#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 22:25:38 | 只看該作者
15#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 05:25:48 | 只看該作者
,Saturation and Pragmatism’s Challenge,processes have an appropriately . place in cognitive lives. This requirement has not been met, nor has there been any psycholinguistic attempt to meet it. According to the Developmental Objection it is unlikely to be met. According to the Occamist Objection, we should then prefer a semantic explanat
16#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 07:11:11 | 只看該作者
,Polysemy and Pragmatism’s Challenge,ous phenomena, PRAG, is that a pragmatic modification of meaning typically plays a role in constituting messages. This generates a “psychological-reality requirement”: pragmatic explanation is committed to there being regular subconscious psychological processes in speakers and hearers that are appr
17#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 13:26:22 | 只看該作者
Sub-Sententials: Pragmatics or Semantics?,l, of such speech is actually syntactically elliptical – and hence should be treated semantically, rather than pragmatically. Stainton objects that there is no such ellipsis with the sub-sententials in question. My semantics-oriented approach does not make the syntactic-ellipsis claim and so is not
18#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 17:08:06 | 只看該作者
Book 2021semantic Bias”, or other such strategies for “meaning denialism”. From this novel perspective, the striking examples of context relativity that motivate contextualists and pragmatists typically exemplify semantic rather than pragmatic properties. In particular, polysemous phenomena should typically
19#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 20:52:30 | 只看該作者
20#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 01:04:19 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-6 20:38
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
都江堰市| 屯留县| 和政县| 天台县| 麟游县| 宁陕县| 万盛区| 宝清县| 常山县| 普陀区| 乌鲁木齐县| 南雄市| 贺州市| 宁乡县| 高淳县| 黑河市| 安庆市| 墨竹工卡县| 双牌县| 巴里| 潞西市| 香格里拉县| 休宁县| 安阳县| 望都县| 康马县| 乐山市| 灌南县| 罗定市| 岢岚县| 景谷| 敦煌市| 且末县| 柏乡县| 板桥市| 滦平县| 海晏县| 潮安县| 岑溪市| 南宫市| 泰和县|