Titlebook: Opening Science; The Evolving Guide o S?nke Bartling,Sascha Friesike Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 2014 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and the Author(s) 2014

Demulcent

BLINK

Heinz Pampel,Sünje Dallmeier-Tiessenekretion, um die Genialit?t dieses Standpunktes zu verstehen. Diese Theorie eilte ihrer Zeit zu sehr voraus und geriet deshalb bald in Vergessenheit. Trotz der zahlreichen Tatsachen, die in den letzten Jahren bewiesen haben, da? diese Gedanken ganz und gar richtig sind, und trotz der gro?en Anzahl v

乳白光

an they have in the last 200. This book provides researchers, decision makers, and other scientific stakeholders with a snapshot of the basics, the tools, and the underlying visions that drive the current scientific (r)evolution, often called ‘Open Science.’.978-3-319-34257-3978-3-319-00026-8

粗鄙的人

(Micro)Blogging Science? Notes on Potentials and Constraints of New Forms of Scholarly Communicatione them as a possible replacement for traditional publishing. This chapter will provide examples of blogs and microblogs as tools for scientific communication for different stakeholders, as well as discuss their implications for digital scholarship.

GUILT

seroma

Open Research Data: From Vision to Practiceg. Starting from a baseline study on current discussions, practices and developments the article describe the challenges of Open Research Data. The authors briefly discuss the barriers and drivers to Data Sharing. Furthermore, the article analyses strategies and approaches to promote and implement D

AGOG

Tortuous

Altmetrics and Other Novel Measures for Scientific Impact

橫條

Book‘‘‘‘‘‘‘‘ 2014in nearly every aspect. Ranging from sharing and discussing ideas in social networks for scientists to new collaborative environments and novel publication formats, knowledge creation and dissemination as we know it is experiencing a vigorous shift towards increased transparency, collaboration and a

Ancillary

Open Science: One Term, Five Schools of Thoughte technological architecture), the . (which is concerned with the accessibility of knowledge creation), the . (which is concerned with alternative impact measurement), the . (which is concerned with access to knowledge) and the . (which is concerned with collaborative research).