Titlebook: Online Incivility and Public Debate; Nasty Talk Gina Masullo Chen Book 2017 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2017 Incivility

背信

Testing the “Defensive Effect” own views in a nasty way, this led first to negative emotions and then to great intention to get politically involved. Civil disagreement did not provoke this effect. Results suggest emotional responses to incivility have the potential to engage the electorate in positive ways if properly channeled.

茁壯成長

collagenase

Introduction: Incivility in Today’s Worldor the main focus of this book, which is how online incivility in news site comment streams influences public debate and political participation. This chapter provides a roadmap for the rest of the book and argues that comment streams have the potential to offer the type of discussions across disagreement vital in a democracy.

迷住

Online Incivility and Public Discoursegreater urgency online because the computer-mediated sphere offers more opportunity for people to speak out, so more informed voices might be drowned out. As a result, there is a greater need to create an online space that is open to a wide variety of viewpoints.

原諒

Nasty Talk Online, the attributes of the digital space that make it so suitable for engaging with other people also offer great opportunity for a legitimate topic of debate to turn into a violent, verbal melee with a lightning speed unknown in earlier days.

ARENA

激怒

Analyzing Comments in the Newsf comments. Results suggest strongly that incivility and deliberation can overlap in comments streams, particularly when the incivility is less virulent. Overall, results point to cautious optimism for the potential for deliberative debate in comment streams.

Kaleidoscope

馬具

conscience