Titlebook: On Reasoning and Argument; Essays in Informal L David Hitchcock Book 2017 Springer International Publishing AG 2017 David Hitchcock.Reasoni

疏忽

Material Consequence and Counterfactualsounterfactual instances. But it need not be law-like. Pearl’s structural model semantics is easier to apply to such counterfactual instances than Lewis’s closest-worlds semantics, and gives intuitively correct results.

單色

解開

Instrumental Rationalitye effects do not outweigh the benefits of achieving the goal. Its conclusion is a decision to bring about the means. The scheme can be reiterated until an implementable means is reached. In a particular context, resource limitations may warrant truncation of the reasoning.

Gene408

1566-7650 ble or have not been widely published.A "must read" for studThis book brings together in one place David Hitchcock’s most significant published articles on reasoning and argument. In seven new chapters he updates his thinking in the light of subsequent scholarship. Collectively, the papers articulat

參考書目

象形文字

Toulmin’s WarrantsNewport News, Vale Press .) and Freeman (.. Foris, Berlin, .). Their criticisms show the need for some revision of Toulmin’s position, but his basic concept of warrant, I shall argue, should be retained as a central concept for the evaluation of arguments.

Conclave

空中

Inference Claimserative associated conditional of an argument is true if and only it has such a covering generalization, and a supposed unexpressed premiss supplied to make an argument formally valid should be a covering generalization.

Allodynia

Pollock on Practical Reasoningly by the contemporary American philosopher Michael Bratman. Despite its advantages, Pollock’s model of practical reasoning is incomplete in at least three respects: it is solipsistic, it is egoistic and it is unsocial.

愛哭

Book 2017es his thinking in the light of subsequent scholarship. Collectively, the papers articulate a distinctive position in the philosophy of argumentation..Among other things, the author:.? develops an account of “material consequence” that permits evaluation of inferences without problematic postulation