Titlebook: On Quanta, Mind and Matter; Hans Primas in Conte H. Atmanspacher,A. Amann,U. Müller-Herold Book 1999 Springer Science+Business Media Dordre

歹徒

Spongy-Bone

Charles P. Enzon of what parents do to their children, or how they raise them, think of them, or feel about them. Professor Kett’s opening, cautionary remark underlines a problem that historians have in turning to the past when trying to answer questions about the relationship between parents and children; about

Terminal

Myocarditis

高射炮

Hans Primas and Nuclear Magnetic Resonancen order to build from scratch a nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectrometer (Fig. 2)? — Inconceivable! We might ask whether we look at a stuntman. — No, indeed, it is himself personally. And those who met Hans Primas forty years ago will not be astonished at all.

neutralize

Fragments of an Algebraic Quantum Mechanics Program for Theoretical Chemistryl his colleagues from the renowned chemistry department of the ETH in Zürich. The issue under discussion was: What are the basic problems — from a contemporary point of view — in chemistry as an academic science, i.e., not directed towards practical application? For however successful chemistry may

Expiration

C*- and W*-Algebras of Observables, Their Interpretations, and the Problem of Measurement. The main pioneering phase in the development of quantum mechanics was finished in the early 1930s and has been summarized excellently in von Neumann’s monograph (1932) on the mathematical foundations of quantum mechanics. Algebraic quantum theory started in the mid 1930s essentially with Jordan’s

不公開(kāi)

Temporal Nonlocality, the thoughts of the Greek philosopher Zeno of Elea, which led him to believe that change, and therefore time, was an illusion. It was Heraclitus, who held the opposing view: change is “real”, states are an illusion. Both together support the common impression that the concepts of . and . contradic

jocular

胰臟

Macroscopic Quantum Phenomena at the Squidr “cat paradox” (Schr?dinger 1935, Audretsch and Mainzer 1990). The usual point of view takes it for granted that the attributes “l(fā)iving” and “dead” of the system “cat” are so different that their combination into a state, in which none of them is actualized, seems paradoxical. Thus from this point