找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Ombudsmen and ADR; A Comparative Study Naomi Creutzfeldt Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018 socio-legal.admini

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 38790|回復(fù): 45
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 16:09:05 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Ombudsmen and ADR
副標(biāo)題A Comparative Study
編輯Naomi Creutzfeldt
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/701/700885/700885.mp4
概述Draws on an original sample of recent users of ombudsman in Germany and the UK to explore their interaction with the informal justice system.Offers a critical European application and interpretation o
叢書名稱Palgrave Socio-Legal Studies
圖書封面Titlebook: Ombudsmen and ADR; A Comparative Study  Naomi Creutzfeldt Book 2018 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018 socio-legal.admini
描述.How do ordinary people experience and make sense of the informal justice system?? Drawing on original data with British and German users of Ombudsmen— an important institution of informal justice, Naomi Creutzfeldt offers a nuanced comparative answer to this question. In so doing, she takes current debates on procedural justice and legal consciousness forward. This book explores consciousness around ‘a(chǎn)lternatives’ to formal legality and asks how situated assumptions about law and fairness guide people‘s understandings of the informal justice system. Creutzfeldt shows that the everyday relationship that people have with the informal justice system is shaped by their experiences and expectations of the formal legal system and its agents. This book is an innovative theoretical and empirical statement about the future prospects for informal justice in Europe..
出版日期Book 2018
關(guān)鍵詞socio-legal; administrative justice; informal justice system; legality; alternative dispute resolution; p
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-78807-4
isbn_softcover978-3-030-07653-5
isbn_ebook978-3-319-78807-4Series ISSN 2947-9274 Series E-ISSN 2947-9282
issn_series 2947-9274
copyrightThe Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2018
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Ombudsmen and ADR影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Ombudsmen and ADR影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Ombudsmen and ADR網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Ombudsmen and ADR網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Ombudsmen and ADR被引頻次




書目名稱Ombudsmen and ADR被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Ombudsmen and ADR年度引用




書目名稱Ombudsmen and ADR年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Ombudsmen and ADR讀者反饋




書目名稱Ombudsmen and ADR讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 1 人參與投票
 

1票 100.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 20:35:58 | 只看該作者
Naomi Creutzfeldtrücke innerhalb der Begehungsgruppe und die gemeinsame Verst?ndigung über die Bewertung von zentraler Bedeutung.. Diese T?tigkeiten werden üblicherweise unter dem Begriff Peer Review zusammengefasst, womit das Verfahren der Bewertung bezeichnet wird. Hirschauer charakterisiert das Peer Review als ?e
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 01:07:05 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 04:40:15 | 只看該作者
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 10:16:01 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 16:01:17 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 19:48:58 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 01:12:17 | 只看該作者
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 03:33:40 | 只看該作者
Naomi Creutzfeldtg positions on the issue. One position holds that any form of exclusion of women in the military constitutes an act of discrimination or sexism, the sole objective of which is to irrationally defend a ‘man’s domain’.. The central intellectual flaw in this line of argumentation seems to be that it tu
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 09:14:06 | 只看該作者
working life seems subject to scrutiny, regulations and heightened civilizing norm setting. One example may illustrate the changes in gender sensitivity. The gate to the castle of . is impressive. People walking underneath the walls that give entry to the courtyard will see the names of graduated ca
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-7 14:26
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
姚安县| 喀什市| 东源县| 甘泉县| 长丰县| 安图县| 青海省| 松潘县| 罗山县| 泰顺县| 屏东市| 南雄市| 盱眙县| 林芝县| 南通市| 罗甸县| 宜城市| 满城县| 南宁市| 肃南| 平原县| 深水埗区| 昆明市| 霍山县| 乌拉特中旗| 东阳市| 保山市| 朔州市| 澎湖县| 大庆市| 古丈县| 宜兰市| 西乌| 灌南县| 濉溪县| 洛川县| 怀仁县| 赤峰市| 靖宇县| 孝昌县| 黔西县|