Titlebook: Oil Privatization, Public Choice and International Forces; Stephanie M. Hoopes Book 1997 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publi

fallacy

書目名稱Oil Privatization, Public Choice and International Forces影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Oil Privatization, Public Choice and International Forces影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Oil Privatization, Public Choice and International Forces網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Oil Privatization, Public Choice and International Forces網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Oil Privatization, Public Choice and International Forces被引頻次




書目名稱Oil Privatization, Public Choice and International Forces被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Oil Privatization, Public Choice and International Forces年度引用




書目名稱Oil Privatization, Public Choice and International Forces年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Oil Privatization, Public Choice and International Forces讀者反饋




書目名稱Oil Privatization, Public Choice and International Forces讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

minion

,The Build-up of the British Government’s Involvement in Oil,ides an overview of how the government came to own oil assets and sets the stage for the government’s decision to sell them. The two consistent factors in the government’s involvement in the oil industry from 1914 to the mid-1980s were its investment in BP and its reliance on private international o

Lamina

The Sequencing of the Oil Asset Sales in Britain,million for Wytch Farm to ￡5.5 billion for the last tranche of BP shares. The government received ￡8.5 billion in total for the sales, the biggest yield from any single industry sector in the privatisation programme (Vickers and Yarrow, 1988, p. 316). The costs of the privatisation are conservativel

arousal

審問

內(nèi)向者

incarcerate

Politics, Careers and Elections,e parameters to what was possible, they by no means determined the outcome of privatisation of oil assets. Politicians had a choice in whether or not to sell the oil assets. This chapter explores the process by which they made that decision. While that process begins to look clearer in the latter st

Juvenile

Explaining State Disengagement,al and ‘rational’ for those who control government power to seek to push outward their scope of influence. Pluralists see groups, including bureaucrats, as always demanding more services and government responding by building greater capabilities to meet these demands (Dahl, 1961; Halperin, 1974). El

Endearing

Dna262