Titlebook: Not Saussure; A Critique of Post-S Raymond Tallis Book 1995Latest edition Raymond Tallis 1995 critique.Jacques Derrida.literary theory.Saus

皺紋

書(shū)目名稱Not Saussure影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱Not Saussure影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Not Saussure網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱Not Saussure網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Not Saussure被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱Not Saussure被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Not Saussure年度引用




書(shū)目名稱Not Saussure年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱Not Saussure讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱Not Saussure讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

employor

攤位

不再流行

權(quán)宜之計(jì)

Literature, Language and Reality: An Introductioneality and the true status of apparently referential discourse. These doubts may crystallise into one of two theses: either that referential discourse is impossible because extra-linguistic reality lies beyond the reach of language; or that it seems possible only because apparently extra-linguistic

懸掛

The Illusion of Referenceress in this section, however, is the . to which reality is intra-linguistic and language is the agent or medium in virtue of which reality is structured or constituted. More particularly, I shall question the radically nominalist assumption, common to many post-Saussurean critics, that the traffic

Heterodoxy

Reference Restoredo so only because they believe that language is a reflecting mirror or a transparent window — at any rate, a passive surface that effaces itself before an extra-linguistic reality which it undistortingly reflects or reveals.

conifer

Modicum

防水

Statements, Facts and the Correspondence Theory of Truthan argument in Plato’s ., first brought it to the forefront of the debate about the nature of truth. Much of the controversy surrounding the Theory has arisen because its advocates and opponents have had different ideas about what it is that is supposed to correspond to or with what. The uncertainty