Titlebook: Non-Metaphysical Theology After Heidegger; Peter S. Dillard Book 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2016 Divinity.Hermen

使顯得不重要

Medley

From Proto-Theology to Phenomenology,ard argues that the holy “needs” non-metaphysical being in order to deconstruct antinomies that distort our thinking about divinity. It is emphasized that ongoing dialog between . and . theologies manifests a common core of faith.

Iatrogenic

Deconstructive Scriptural Meaning,ural hermeneutic is compatible with either . or . theology, thus illustrating how both theologies can be biblically based. Therefore, additional considerations are required in order to decide in favor of one of these theologies.

休息

Embolic-Stroke

fastness

Book 2016rom Heidegger’s initially obscure texts concerning the holy, the gods, and the last god, Dillard extracts two possible non-metaphysical theologies: a theology of Streit and a theology of Gelassenheit. Both theologies promise to avoid metaphysical antinomies that traditionally hinder theology. After

conjunctiva

Introduction: What Has Jerusalem to Do with Todtnauberg?,some of which were not yet available to Ott and his contemporaries. A more optimistic conjecture is that Heidegger suggests several contrasting views of the relation between being and the holy, one of which may turn out to be preferable to the others. Dillard substantiates this conjecture in the next chapter.

galley