Titlebook: Nominalism and Its Aftermath: The Philosophy of Nelson Goodman; Dena Shottenkirk Book 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009 Aesth

Myosin

Oligarchy

言外之意

Influences on Goodman’s Philosophyhave argued that Goodman’s semantics likewise led to a kind of solipsistic idealism. Goodman’s resemblance to James was not just in Goodman’s advocacy of pluralism, for like the pragmatists’ unwillingness to choose sides between the materialists and the idealists, Goodman was unwilling to choose sid

凝乳

The Effects of Goodman’s Epistemology on his Terminology/Conceptsare not “natural” but are instead delineated by our own social agreements that have codified themselves into the logic of semantics. For Goodman, there is no “natural” way of seeing things nor are there any natural kinds.

吵鬧

Goodman’s Expression as Referencens of the notion and word “property” are ones Goodman must avoid if he is to explain expression solely in terms of extensionalist reference, which is the genus encompassing all the separate species of denotation, representation, expression, and exemplification. Representation and expression are the

牽連

策略