找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: No Longer the Same; Religious Others and David R. Brockman Book 2011 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Nature America Inc. 2011 argue.Chris

[復制鏈接]
樓主: 我在爭斗志
11#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 11:14:41 | 只看該作者
12#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 17:41:14 | 只看該作者
Outsiders and Insiders,out what non-Christians think? What’s wrong with a sharp separation between the Christian “inside” and the non-Christian “outside”? Isn’t Christian theology an inherently intra-Christian conversation, a discourse carried on . Christians . Christian belief . Christian purposes? If so, why should it i
13#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 20:59:10 | 只看該作者
14#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 01:55:00 | 只看該作者
Schleiermacher,Barth, though vigorously opposed to key aspects of Schleiermacher’s theology, admitted, “The first place in a history of the theology of the most recent times belongs and will always belong to Schleiermacher, and he has no rival.”. Keith Clements notes that “Schleiermacher’s ascription of religion t
15#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 05:26:25 | 只看該作者
16#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 09:12:08 | 只看該作者
,Gutiérrez,lity of transformative encounter with religious others and thus, potentially, with the divine Other. In this chapter we examine how a fourth theologian fares: Gustavo Gutiérrez. Gutiérrez is the only one of our four theologians to make an explicit turn to the marginalized and to focus on their strug
17#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 12:05:23 | 只看該作者
Conclusion,t least the only game that mattered. In this respect, the four theologians we have examined end up offering more of the same. Despite dramatic differences in method, in their construal of “the Christian,” and in the authority structures upon which they ground their theological formulations, they con
18#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 15:33:52 | 只看該作者
n de l’amylo?de dans le système nerveux il y a quelques lacunes à remplir. Nous ne savons ainsi par exemple pas, en ce qui conserne les racines rachidiennes, à quelle distance de la mo?lle épinière les dép?ts commencent à appara?tre. De même nous ne savons pas à quelle distance de leur origine les d
19#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-24 21:15:54 | 只看該作者
20#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-25 01:33:06 | 只看該作者
Introduction,eve and what those beliefs mean for their own lives—tended to be a conversation in which Christians talked among themselves, as if the wider religious world did not exist, did not matter, or was simply a realm of the idolatrous and the damned.
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網 吾愛論文網 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經驗總結 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-25 09:26
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網安備110108008328 版權所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
鸡东县| 廊坊市| 昌平区| 高邑县| 荆州市| 漳浦县| 台州市| 运城市| 抚宁县| 双柏县| 驻马店市| 郸城县| 乌拉特前旗| 辽中县| 桓仁| 循化| 黄浦区| 大名县| 安徽省| 香港 | 安阳县| 海宁市| 凤庆县| 通州市| 邛崃市| 邢台市| 台东市| 洪泽县| 衡阳市| 车险| 双鸭山市| 乌兰县| 吴江市| 陈巴尔虎旗| 定日县| 汽车| 定远县| 长海县| 金山区| 井陉县| 许昌县|