Titlebook: New Issues and Paradigms in Research on Social Dilemmas; Anders Biel,Daniel Eek,Mathias Gustafsson Book 2008 Springer-Verlag US 2008 Feedb

符合國情

doxazosin

intellect

How Do We React to Feedback in Social Dilemmas?,1995). In answering the question of how people deal with such conflicting motives, experimental research has used a variety of experimental games that are modeled after real-life situations. Two of the main types are the “public-good dilemma” and the “resource dilemma.” Research on social dilemmas h

ANT

Group-Based Trust in Social Dilemmas,nizations, and trust in groups (e.g. Cook, Hardin & Levi, 2005; Gambetta & Hamill, 2005; Kramer, 1999; Molm, 2006; Yamagishi & Yamagishi, 2004). In this chapter we address the question of trust that arises from shared membership in groups in settings which do not provide the opportunity for developm

種類

Promoting Cooperation in Social Dilemmas via Fairness Norms and Group Goals,elong. What seems to be an individually rational choice may later have detrimental effects on the wellbeing of the group. Such conflicts of interest are referred to as social dilemmas (Dawes, 1980). Social dilemmas are formally defined as situations in which (1) individual outcomes for non-cooperati

注意到

Bringing Back Leviathan into Social Dilemmas,tial book on social dilemmas ever (Hobbes, 1651) and argued that social order cannot be maintained without authority that controls individuals’ unrestricted pursuit of selfinterest. According to Hobbes, people who prefer peace (mutual cooperation) to a war of all against all (mutual defection) shoul

高原