Titlebook: New Developments in Legal Reasoning and Logic; From Ancient Law to Shahid Rahman,Matthias Armgardt,Hans Christian Nor Book 2022 Springer N

HABIT

書目名稱New Developments in Legal Reasoning and Logic影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱New Developments in Legal Reasoning and Logic影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱New Developments in Legal Reasoning and Logic網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱New Developments in Legal Reasoning and Logic網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱New Developments in Legal Reasoning and Logic被引頻次




書目名稱New Developments in Legal Reasoning and Logic被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱New Developments in Legal Reasoning and Logic年度引用




書目名稱New Developments in Legal Reasoning and Logic年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱New Developments in Legal Reasoning and Logic讀者反饋




書目名稱New Developments in Legal Reasoning and Logic讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

高貴領(lǐng)導(dǎo)

The Use of Logic for Creating Fact Patterns in Roman Legal Writings – An Alternative Perspective on ed to present and discuss legal cases in their textbooks. For this purpose we analyze one particular text in the Digest attributed to Julian, D. 35,2,87 on inheritance law. We conjecture that Julian may have used abstract, logical thinking to enlarge the set of real-world cases to present more compl

dissent

The Formal Evolution of Islamic Juridical Dialectic: A Brief Glimpseare nevertheless apparent; the most important may be the infusion of post-Avicennan syllogistic commonly understood to have begun in the eleventh century CE. This trend towards logical formalism found its greatest expression in a rigorously syllogistic twelfth and thirteenth century Eastern juristic

杠桿支點(diǎn)

Independent Reasoning in Law: The Jewish Traditioning, hermeneutical reasoning, etc.) in the Jewish jurisprudential tradition. It will sketch the historical contours of this question in late ancient and medieval Jewish legal tradition by highlighting the major trends and phenomena of this history. The first focal point of this investigation is the

BLAZE

Rethinking Interpretative Argumentsotential conflicts of opinion, legal practitioners generally provide reasons to support one interpretation over another, resorting to different types of arguments to support their claim. Such arguments were tentatively categorized by MacCormick and Summers (Interpreting statutes. Routledge, New York

FUSE

A Logic for the Interpretation of Private International LawThe Twenty-Ninth Annual Conference, vol.294 of Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, pp. 83–92, IOS Press, 2016) to model reasoning across legal systems. The logic extends the system presented in Rotolo et al. (Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Artificial Intellige

Ptosis

A Formal Model for Analogies in Civil Law Reasoningn different types of legal rules. Taking this as a starting point we develop a formal model going deeper into jurisprudence by referring to balancing interests. This model deals with analogies based on a-fortiori-arguments, a-pari-arguments and a-simile-arguments.

遵循的規(guī)范

Approaching an Analysis of Reasoning by Analogyeloped by Per Martin-L?f, called immanent reasoning. This is done by taking the formulation of legal conditionals to represent the notion of a case and by embedding one formulation inside another, we can represent the dependency that we find of the decision of the target case on the decision in the

FUSE

嘮叨

Abductive Inference in Legal Reasoning: Resolving the Question of Res Ipsa Loquitur’s Procedural Eff examination comes from the fact that several doctrinal practices in diverse areas of law rely on logical inferences that defy neat explanation under standard forms of deductive or inductive logic. I argue that abduction resolves some of these logical infirmities, providing the logic underlying cert