找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開(kāi)始

掃一掃,訪問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: New Confucianism: A Critical Examination; John Makeham Book 2003 John Makeham 2003 China.Chinese.Confucianism.cross-fertilization.culture.

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 34431|回復(fù): 43
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 19:15:23 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書(shū)目名稱New Confucianism: A Critical Examination
編輯John Makeham
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/665/664954/664954.mp4
圖書(shū)封面Titlebook: New Confucianism: A Critical Examination;  John Makeham Book 2003 John Makeham 2003 China.Chinese.Confucianism.cross-fertilization.culture.
描述This collection of essays explores the development of the New Confucianism movement during the twentieth-century and questions whether it is, in fact, a distinctly new intellectual movement or one that has been mostly retrospectively created. The questions that contributors to this book seek to answer about this neo-conservative philosophical movement include: ‘What has been the cross-fertilization between Chinese scholars in China and overseas made possible by the shared discourse of Confucianism?‘; ‘To what extent does this discourse transcend geographical, political, cultural, and ideological divides?‘; ‘Why do so many Chinese intellectuals equate Confucianism with Chinese cultural identity?‘; and ‘Does the Confucian revival of the 1990s in China and Taiwan represent a genuine philosophical renaissance or a resurgence in interest based on political and cultural factors?‘.
出版日期Book 2003
關(guān)鍵詞China; Chinese; Confucianism; cross-fertilization; culture; discourse; essay; identity; metaphysics; philosop
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1057/9781403982414
isbn_softcover978-1-349-52652-9
isbn_ebook978-1-4039-8241-4
copyrightJohn Makeham 2003
The information of publication is updating

書(shū)目名稱New Confucianism: A Critical Examination影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱New Confucianism: A Critical Examination影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱New Confucianism: A Critical Examination網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱New Confucianism: A Critical Examination網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱New Confucianism: A Critical Examination被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱New Confucianism: A Critical Examination被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱New Confucianism: A Critical Examination年度引用




書(shū)目名稱New Confucianism: A Critical Examination年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱New Confucianism: A Critical Examination讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱New Confucianism: A Critical Examination讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 0 人參與投票
 

0票 0%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒(méi)有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 20:30:11 | 只看該作者
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 01:53:17 | 只看該作者
Introductions is because the term “Confucianism” has been variously applied to so many different things, some of the more common being the philosophical and ethical teachings of a number of thinkers (including Confucius), a tradition of scholarship, a religion, a social ethic, and a state ideology. One scholar
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 06:32:47 | 只看該作者
The Retrospective Creation of New Confucianism there is little evidence that New Confucianism had attained a degree of integration or coalescence sufficient for it to be recognized and promoted as a distinct philosophical movement or school of thought before the 1970s. Crucially, up until that time, the “New Confucians” did not have a sense of
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 09:37:35 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 13:28:00 | 只看該作者
Reconstructing the Confucian Ideal in 1980s China: The “Culture Craze” and New ConfucianismFueled with ammunition from a range of imported “isms,” participants in the cultural debates attempted to map out national and Western cultural territories. Many intellectuals attempted to redefine what is meant by Chinese culture and to rediscover the “national essence” through their study of New C
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 17:41:23 | 只看該作者
Li Zehou and New Confucianism New Confucianism outside mainland China, Li Zehou, an avowed Marxist or “post-Marxist,” would be the last person to be accorded a place in the New Confucian canon. It is their common perception that Marxists and communists are responsible for destroying the Confucian tradition in China. By a curiou
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 23:25:55 | 只看該作者
What is Confucian and New about the Thought of Mou Zongsan?t the theoretical framework of Mou’s thought system. I will do this with the aim of introducing the subject to a Western readership largely unfamiliar with New Confucian thought. The other two objectives focus on the “New Confucian” label used to identify Mou’s thought. I will first establish that M
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 05:20:24 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 06:48:42 | 只看該作者
The “Last Buddhist”: The Philosophy of Liang Shumingn fact, a Confucian. Guy Alitto’s 1986 publication, . (hereafter, .) has provided considerable currency for this assumption in the West. In this chapter, I will explore an alternative portrayal of Liang, asking whether it is more valid to categorize the spirit, views, and philosophy of Liang Shuming
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-22 08:37
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
汝南县| 长顺县| 东乌珠穆沁旗| 井冈山市| 宁夏| 禄劝| 略阳县| 理塘县| 龙门县| 桐城市| 缙云县| 岗巴县| 竹溪县| 苗栗县| 宾阳县| 大港区| 郯城县| 都兰县| 繁昌县| 绥阳县| 巨鹿县| 阜宁县| 梧州市| 崇文区| 福鼎市| 绥江县| 恭城| 武乡县| 隆回县| 黔江区| 曲松县| 新河县| 屯门区| 绍兴市| 昌邑市| 翁源县| 合江县| 黑水县| 武胜县| 富源县| 台南市|