找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Neuroethics, Justice and Autonomy: Public Reason in the Cognitive Enhancement Debate; Veljko Dubljevi? Book 2019 Springer Nature Switzerla

[復制鏈接]
查看: 44131|回復: 39
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 19:09:01 | 只看該作者 |倒序瀏覽 |閱讀模式
書目名稱Neuroethics, Justice and Autonomy: Public Reason in the Cognitive Enhancement Debate
編輯Veljko Dubljevi?
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/665/664044/664044.mp4
概述The first book to explicitly address a political approach to neuroethics.Provides a strong argument on the much debated issue of cognitive enhancement practices within society.Deals with specific poli
叢書名稱The International Library of Ethics, Law and Technology
圖書封面Titlebook: Neuroethics, Justice and Autonomy: Public Reason in the Cognitive Enhancement Debate;  Veljko Dubljevi? Book 2019 Springer Nature Switzerla
描述.This book explicitly addresses policy options in a democratic society regarding cognitive enhancement drugs and devices. The book offers an in-depth case by case analysis of existing and emerging cognitive neuroenhancement technologies and canvasses a distinct political neuroethics approach. The author provides an argument on the much debated issue of fairness of cognitive enhancement practices and tackles the tricky issue of how to respect preferences of citizens opposing and those preferring enhancement. The author persuasively argues the necessity of a laws and regulations regarding the use of cognitive enhancers. He also argues that the funds for those who seek cognitive enhancement should be allocated free of charge to the least advantaged.? The work argues that the notion of autonomy has been mistakenly associated with the metaphysical concept of free will, and offers a political definition of autonomy to clarify how responsibility is implicitly grounded in the legal and political system. As such, this book is an essential read for everyone interested in neuroethics, and a valuable resource for policy makers, as well as scholars and students in philosophy, law, psychiatry an
出版日期Book 2019
關鍵詞cognitive enhancement; neuroscience interventions; political philosophy; neuroethics; utilitarianism; Raw
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-13643-7
isbn_ebook978-3-030-13643-7Series ISSN 1875-0044 Series E-ISSN 1875-0036
issn_series 1875-0044
copyrightSpringer Nature Switzerland AG 2019
The information of publication is updating

書目名稱Neuroethics, Justice and Autonomy: Public Reason in the Cognitive Enhancement Debate影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Neuroethics, Justice and Autonomy: Public Reason in the Cognitive Enhancement Debate影響因子(影響力)學科排名




書目名稱Neuroethics, Justice and Autonomy: Public Reason in the Cognitive Enhancement Debate網(wǎng)絡公開度




書目名稱Neuroethics, Justice and Autonomy: Public Reason in the Cognitive Enhancement Debate網(wǎng)絡公開度學科排名




書目名稱Neuroethics, Justice and Autonomy: Public Reason in the Cognitive Enhancement Debate被引頻次




書目名稱Neuroethics, Justice and Autonomy: Public Reason in the Cognitive Enhancement Debate被引頻次學科排名




書目名稱Neuroethics, Justice and Autonomy: Public Reason in the Cognitive Enhancement Debate年度引用




書目名稱Neuroethics, Justice and Autonomy: Public Reason in the Cognitive Enhancement Debate年度引用學科排名




書目名稱Neuroethics, Justice and Autonomy: Public Reason in the Cognitive Enhancement Debate讀者反饋




書目名稱Neuroethics, Justice and Autonomy: Public Reason in the Cognitive Enhancement Debate讀者反饋學科排名




單選投票, 共有 1 人參與投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

1票 100.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

0票 0.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶組沒有投票權限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 21:10:20 | 只看該作者
The International Library of Ethics, Law and Technologyhttp://image.papertrans.cn/n/image/664044.jpg
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 02:02:22 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 07:25:28 | 只看該作者
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 10:40:29 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 14:28:26 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 20:57:48 | 只看該作者
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 00:11:50 | 只看該作者
Are There Problems with the Economic Disincentives Model of Regulation?In the chapter on empirical constraints of psychopharmacological cognitive enhancers (Chap.?.), I analyzed available information and policy options for the two of the most commonly used cognitive enhancement (CE) drugs: Adderall and Ritalin.
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 02:16:10 | 只看該作者
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 08:05:30 | 只看該作者
 關于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結 SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-11 03:58
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
石嘴山市| 嘉黎县| 驻马店市| 文化| 越西县| 阳城县| 博客| 山阳县| 洛川县| 特克斯县| 定结县| 定边县| 德清县| 玛纳斯县| 沈丘县| 鄄城县| 射阳县| 磐安县| 苗栗县| 神木县| 新安县| 芜湖市| 酉阳| 金阳县| 巢湖市| 阿巴嘎旗| 汶川县| 仙居县| 寿光市| 鄂伦春自治旗| 江山市| 新丰县| 伽师县| 乾安县| 昆明市| 宜阳县| 万安县| 西吉县| 乐平市| 子长县| 揭阳市|