找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Neue Entwicklungen in der Dermatologie; Band 4 O. P. Hornstein,M. Hundeiker,J. Sch?nfeld Book 1987Latest edition Springer-Verlag Berlin Hei

[復制鏈接]
樓主: False-Negative
31#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 00:33:59 | 只看該作者
O. Maie,Urs. W. Schnyderty and imagination with the proper use of careful, multidisciplinary epidemiologic approaches. Dr. Guntern has attacked some of the cardinal aspects of the consequences, in terms of health, well.being. and social function, of rapid social change in an originally isolated rural community - a phenomen
32#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 03:13:44 | 只看該作者
H. Pfisterty and imagination with the proper use of careful, multidisciplinary epidemiologic approaches. Dr. Guntern has attacked some of the cardinal aspects of the consequences, in terms of health, well.being. and social function, of rapid social change in an originally isolated rural community - a phenomen
33#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 05:58:32 | 只看該作者
34#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 13:27:38 | 只看該作者
35#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 17:38:52 | 只看該作者
S. W. Wassilew,Th. Nasemannory of social choice and mechanism design. We examine the premises of this theory, the axiomatic approach, and the mechanism design approach. The main questions are what is collective interest, how is it related to individuals‘ interests, how should one design social interactions, laws, and in- stit
36#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 19:16:07 | 只看該作者
37#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 22:17:16 | 只看該作者
38#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 03:29:35 | 只看該作者
M. F?ldi,L. Clodius P.D.,J. R. Casley-Smithis path-breaking contribution, Sen (1970a, 1970b) introduced the first formal formulation of individual rights in social choice theory. Since then, several writers have raised critical questions regarding the appropriateness of this formulation and have explored alternative approaches: see Nozick (1
39#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 10:02:17 | 只看該作者
G. M?llhoffis path-breaking contribution, Sen (1970a, 1970b) introduced the first formal formulation of individual rights in social choice theory. Since then, several writers have raised critical questions regarding the appropriateness of this formulation and have explored alternative approaches: see Nozick (1
40#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 13:01:23 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學 Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學 Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-6 10:33
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復 返回頂部 返回列表
忻州市| 大同市| 枣阳市| 海城市| 闽侯县| 山东| 汝州市| 遵义市| 探索| 镇康县| 大竹县| 咸阳市| 临沂市| 辉县市| 中宁县| 青阳县| 吕梁市| 安宁市| 崇阳县| 兰坪| 洛川县| 深圳市| 元氏县| 比如县| 青河县| 长岛县| 道孚县| 繁昌县| 三原县| 梁平县| 巩义市| 赤城县| 蒙自县| 连城县| 临漳县| 双牌县| 淳化县| 民丰县| 长乐市| 连江县| 三门县|