Titlebook: Negotiated Risks; International Talks Gunnar Sj?stedt,Rudolf Avenhaus Book 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009 Climate Change.Inte

形容詞

Negotiations on National Security Risks: The Case of U.S.–Soviet Relationscialist Republics (USSR) during the ColdWar years, the closer both sides came—advertently or inadvertently—to the brink of hot war. Too many arms meant too high the risk of a showdown, even one that was unwanted. Both superpowers began subscribing to this maxim somewhere around the time of the Cuban

ELATE

Transboundary Risks: The Case of Temel′?nrldwide nuclear development; it built one industrial 10 MWreactor in Seibersdorf (commissioned in September 1960), one university training reactor in Vienna (commissioned in March 1962), and another 1 KW training reactor in Graz (commissioned in May 1965). The Seibersdorf reactor was also to be the

廣告

Spent Fuel Import, Storage, and Reprocessing in the Russian Federation: An Evaluation of Actors and such concerns as environmental and health risks to current and future generations from the toxic nature of the spent fuel; risks of proliferation of nuclear weapons; risks of diversion of nuclear materials to terrorist organizations; and political risks associated with the very high level of public

表示問

Breach

護身符

Serenity

無聊的人

Conclusions, often representing an extra burden to those who conduct it or who are responsible for its outcome. Risks increase the degree of complexity in multilateral talks: risks are burdensome in all situations because of the technical difficulty of the questions addressed and the great number of issues and

冬眠

Take the Risk and Trust? The Strategic Role of Trust in Negotiationss at stake are framed as risks. In this type of negotiation the actors’ efforts focus on handling such diverse threats as climate change, arms race, armed conflicts, or joint-venture negotiations, to name but a few. The main question to be answered here is whether a risk frame influences negotiation processes and outcomes—and, if so, how.

抱怨

Negotiation Risk: Controlling Biological Weaponsons. After a brief introduction to the relevant theoretical issues concerning how risk affects negotiations, it presents a brief history of negotiations to limit biological agents as instruments of warfare and terrorism, and then focuses primarily on the negotiation of the 1972 Biological Weapons Convention.