找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Ne bis in idem and Multiple Sanctioning Systems; A Case Law Study of Javier Ignacio Escobar Veas Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) a

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: estrange
31#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 21:47:31 | 只看該作者
2524-8049 ossible protections against multiple sanctioning systems. Two other safeguards that limit multiple sanctioning systems are the prohibition of disproportionate sanctions and the right to be tried within a reasonable time.978-3-031-16558-0978-3-031-16556-6Series ISSN 2524-8049 Series E-ISSN 2524-8057
32#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 02:45:37 | 只看該作者
Case Law of the Supreme Court of the United StatesThe Fifth Amendment guarantee against double jeopardy is one of the basic protections afforded to defendants by the United States Constitution. The Fifth Amendment reads in part:
33#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 08:06:05 | 只看該作者
Case Law of the Supreme Court of CanadaSection?11 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms sets out several rights for anyone who is “charged with an offence”. Section?11 (h) of the Charter, which aims to protect the defendant against double jeopardy, states:
34#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 09:59:32 | 只看該作者
Case Law of the European Court of Human RightsThe . was not recognised in the European Convention of Human Rights until its incorporation in Article?4 of Protocol?7, which states:
35#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 17:27:49 | 只看該作者
36#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 20:30:35 | 只看該作者
Overcoming the Dead End of the Thesis of the Criminal NatureOne of the problems with the caselaw of the ECtHR and the CJEU addressed in the Second Part was the dead end of the current approach of the criminal nature thesis. As stated above, there are two problems with the current approach of the European courts.
37#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 22:01:56 | 只看該作者
Final RemarksAlthough the . is extensively proclaimed by national legal systems and international human rights instruments, several difficulties arise when the protection is applied to concrete cases, especially in the context of multiple sanctioning systems.
38#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 03:41:06 | 只看該作者
Case Law of the Court of Justice of the European Unionin every Member State. In this context, the CJEU has jurisdiction to give preliminary rulings concerning the interpretation of EU Treaties. Thus, when a party raises a question regarding the EU Charter before a national court of a Member State, that tribunal may request the CJEU to give a ruling on that question.
39#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 09:02:28 | 只看該作者
Understanding Multiple Sanctioning Systems: Models of Organisation the task of developing a satisfactory interpretation on the lawfulness of multiple sanctioning systems under the .. Therefore, it is necessary to propose a general reconceptualisation of the . under Protocol?7 to the European Convention of Human Rights and the EU Charter.
40#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 12:10:48 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-8 06:40
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
汉沽区| 南雄市| 都兰县| 吴川市| 蒙山县| 吴忠市| 金寨县| 增城市| 新竹县| 应城市| 玉门市| 从江县| 漯河市| 台中市| 开封县| 灵璧县| 塔河县| 宁河县| 民乐县| 中牟县| 榆中县| 华安县| 蒙自县| 东阿县| 彰化市| 盐池县| 澜沧| 喀喇| 东丽区| 安新县| 通化县| 赤水市| 安徽省| 南木林县| 无锡市| 柘城县| 西宁市| 彰化市| 柳州市| 沐川县| 普宁市|