找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開始

掃一掃,訪問微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Ne bis in idem and Multiple Sanctioning Systems; A Case Law Study of Javier Ignacio Escobar Veas Book 2023 The Editor(s) (if applicable) a

[復(fù)制鏈接]
樓主: estrange
31#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-26 21:47:31 | 只看該作者
2524-8049 ossible protections against multiple sanctioning systems. Two other safeguards that limit multiple sanctioning systems are the prohibition of disproportionate sanctions and the right to be tried within a reasonable time.978-3-031-16558-0978-3-031-16556-6Series ISSN 2524-8049 Series E-ISSN 2524-8057
32#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 02:45:37 | 只看該作者
Case Law of the Supreme Court of the United StatesThe Fifth Amendment guarantee against double jeopardy is one of the basic protections afforded to defendants by the United States Constitution. The Fifth Amendment reads in part:
33#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 08:06:05 | 只看該作者
Case Law of the Supreme Court of CanadaSection?11 of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms sets out several rights for anyone who is “charged with an offence”. Section?11 (h) of the Charter, which aims to protect the defendant against double jeopardy, states:
34#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 09:59:32 | 只看該作者
Case Law of the European Court of Human RightsThe . was not recognised in the European Convention of Human Rights until its incorporation in Article?4 of Protocol?7, which states:
35#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 17:27:49 | 只看該作者
36#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 20:30:35 | 只看該作者
Overcoming the Dead End of the Thesis of the Criminal NatureOne of the problems with the caselaw of the ECtHR and the CJEU addressed in the Second Part was the dead end of the current approach of the criminal nature thesis. As stated above, there are two problems with the current approach of the European courts.
37#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-27 22:01:56 | 只看該作者
Final RemarksAlthough the . is extensively proclaimed by national legal systems and international human rights instruments, several difficulties arise when the protection is applied to concrete cases, especially in the context of multiple sanctioning systems.
38#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 03:41:06 | 只看該作者
Case Law of the Court of Justice of the European Unionin every Member State. In this context, the CJEU has jurisdiction to give preliminary rulings concerning the interpretation of EU Treaties. Thus, when a party raises a question regarding the EU Charter before a national court of a Member State, that tribunal may request the CJEU to give a ruling on that question.
39#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 09:02:28 | 只看該作者
Understanding Multiple Sanctioning Systems: Models of Organisation the task of developing a satisfactory interpretation on the lawfulness of multiple sanctioning systems under the .. Therefore, it is necessary to propose a general reconceptualisation of the . under Protocol?7 to the European Convention of Human Rights and the EU Charter.
40#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-28 12:10:48 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點評 投稿經(jīng)驗總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2025-10-8 08:29
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
霍邱县| 思茅市| 吉木萨尔县| 宾阳县| 越西县| 永州市| 拜泉县| 定日县| 维西| 印江| 全南县| 尼木县| 临潭县| 襄樊市| 聊城市| 鄂尔多斯市| 都匀市| 白银市| 天水市| 景泰县| 元氏县| 南澳县| 北碚区| 盐池县| 肇源县| 兴国县| 三门峡市| 拉萨市| 盐城市| 百色市| 拉孜县| 马鞍山市| 修文县| 大安市| 翼城县| 灵丘县| 木兰县| 义乌市| 兰溪市| 永新县| 乌兰察布市|