Titlebook: Nationalizing the Past; Historians as Nation Stefan Berger,Chris Lorenz Book 2010 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s) 2010 20.

Observe

vector

阻擋

archetype

,Theorizing and Practising ‘Scientific’ History in South-Eastern Europe (Nineteenth–Twentieth Centurcourse of the eighteenth century. The turn towards experiential knowledge contributed to the increase of interest in specific rules of method and research for history. Scientificity arose as a central goal for history at the turn of the eighteenth century. It became primarily associated with empiric

糾纏

政府

BET

不近人情

,Inside-Out: The Purposes of Form in Friedrich Meinecke’s and Robert Aron’s Explanations of National (1946) and Robert Aron (1898–1975) in . (1950).. Our focus will be on the forms of argument the historians used to frame their works and how this shaped their communication of ideological assumptions. Meinecke subtitled his work ‘Reflections and Memories’; however, his short essay is not very autob

字形刻痕

,Clio and Class Struggle in Socialist Histories of the Nation: A Comparison of Robert Grimm’s and Ednd early twentieth-century Germany remained exclusively focused on nation building ‘from above’ and featured a narrow statesman- and state- centred spectrum of narratives. The methodological layout of German history, called ‘., moreover, proved ignorant of the social transformations that had accompa

extinct