找回密碼
 To register

QQ登錄

只需一步,快速開(kāi)始

掃一掃,訪(fǎng)問(wèn)微社區(qū)

打印 上一主題 下一主題

Titlebook: Modal Justification via Theories; Bob Fischer Book 2017 Springer International Publishing AG 2017 Modal Disagreement.Modal Epistemology.Mo

[復(fù)制鏈接]
查看: 27792|回復(fù): 35
樓主
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 19:52:22 | 只看該作者 |倒序?yàn)g覽 |閱讀模式
書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Modal Justification via Theories
編輯Bob Fischer
視頻videohttp://file.papertrans.cn/636/635697/635697.mp4
概述Offers a new approach to modal epistemology.Identifies a new strategy for defending modal skepticism.Shows how modal epistemology can be naturalized
叢書(shū)名稱(chēng)Synthese Library
圖書(shū)封面Titlebook: Modal Justification via Theories;  Bob Fischer Book 2017 Springer International Publishing AG 2017 Modal Disagreement.Modal Epistemology.Mo
描述.This monograph articulates and defends a theory-based epistemology of modality (TEM).?According to TEM, someone justifiably believe an interesting modal claim if and only if (a) she justifiably believes a theory according to which that claim is true, (b) she believes that claim on the basis of that theory, and (c) she has no defeaters for her belief in that claim. The book has two parts. In the first, the author motivates TEM, sets out the view in detail, and defends it against a number of objections. In the second, the author considers whether TEM is worth accepting. To argue that it is, the author sets out criteria for choosing between modal epistemologies, concluding that TEM has a number of important virtues. However, the author also concedes that TEM is cautious: it probably implies that we are not justified in believing some interesting modal claims that we might take ourselves to be justified in believing. This raises a question about TEM‘s relationship to Peter van Inwagen‘s modal skepticism, which the author explores in detail. As it turns out, TEM offers a better route to modal skepticism than the one that van Inwagen provides. But rather than being a liability, the auth
出版日期Book 2017
關(guān)鍵詞Modal Disagreement; Modal Epistemology; Modal Justification; Modal Knowledge; Modal Skepticism; Peter Van
版次1
doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-49127-1
isbn_softcover978-3-319-84089-5
isbn_ebook978-3-319-49127-1Series ISSN 0166-6991 Series E-ISSN 2542-8292
issn_series 0166-6991
copyrightSpringer International Publishing AG 2017
The information of publication is updating

書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Modal Justification via Theories影響因子(影響力)




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Modal Justification via Theories影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Modal Justification via Theories網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Modal Justification via Theories網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開(kāi)度學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Modal Justification via Theories被引頻次




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Modal Justification via Theories被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Modal Justification via Theories年度引用




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Modal Justification via Theories年度引用學(xué)科排名




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Modal Justification via Theories讀者反饋




書(shū)目名稱(chēng)Modal Justification via Theories讀者反饋學(xué)科排名




單選投票, 共有 1 人參與投票
 

0票 0.00%

Perfect with Aesthetics

 

0票 0.00%

Better Implies Difficulty

 

1票 100.00%

Good and Satisfactory

 

0票 0.00%

Adverse Performance

 

0票 0.00%

Disdainful Garbage

您所在的用戶(hù)組沒(méi)有投票權(quán)限
沙發(fā)
發(fā)表于 2025-3-21 23:44:16 | 只看該作者
978-3-319-84089-5Springer International Publishing AG 2017
板凳
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 01:05:56 | 只看該作者
地板
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 05:49:05 | 只看該作者
Synthese Libraryhttp://image.papertrans.cn/m/image/635697.jpg
5#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 08:46:39 | 只看該作者
6#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 14:43:20 | 只看該作者
7#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 19:47:15 | 只看該作者
Book 2017dal claim if and only if (a) she justifiably believes a theory according to which that claim is true, (b) she believes that claim on the basis of that theory, and (c) she has no defeaters for her belief in that claim. The book has two parts. In the first, the author motivates TEM, sets out the view
8#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-22 22:41:57 | 只看該作者
0166-6991 in detail. As it turns out, TEM offers a better route to modal skepticism than the one that van Inwagen provides. But rather than being a liability, the auth978-3-319-84089-5978-3-319-49127-1Series ISSN 0166-6991 Series E-ISSN 2542-8292
9#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 03:19:31 | 只看該作者
Book 2017 be justified in believing. This raises a question about TEM‘s relationship to Peter van Inwagen‘s modal skepticism, which the author explores in detail. As it turns out, TEM offers a better route to modal skepticism than the one that van Inwagen provides. But rather than being a liability, the auth
10#
發(fā)表于 2025-3-23 05:49:12 | 只看該作者
 關(guān)于派博傳思  派博傳思旗下網(wǎng)站  友情鏈接
派博傳思介紹 公司地理位置 論文服務(wù)流程 影響因子官網(wǎng) 吾愛(ài)論文網(wǎng) 大講堂 北京大學(xué) Oxford Uni. Harvard Uni.
發(fā)展歷史沿革 期刊點(diǎn)評(píng) 投稿經(jīng)驗(yàn)總結(jié) SCIENCEGARD IMPACTFACTOR 派博系數(shù) 清華大學(xué) Yale Uni. Stanford Uni.
QQ|Archiver|手機(jī)版|小黑屋| 派博傳思國(guó)際 ( 京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328) GMT+8, 2026-1-20 02:58
Copyright © 2001-2015 派博傳思   京公網(wǎng)安備110108008328 版權(quán)所有 All rights reserved
快速回復(fù) 返回頂部 返回列表
林口县| 济南市| 新竹市| 江永县| 本溪| 延吉市| 东莞市| 安溪县| 邵东县| 和田县| 山丹县| 绥棱县| 西城区| 淮滨县| 池州市| 大新县| 大兴区| 襄汾县| 青川县| 阜宁县| 卢氏县| 安塞县| 五原县| 濉溪县| 鄂州市| 仁怀市| 治多县| 穆棱市| 霍林郭勒市| 桑日县| 山西省| 龙里县| 承德县| 榆树市| 昔阳县| 丽水市| 义马市| 舟山市| 灌云县| 勃利县| 佳木斯市|