Titlebook: Michael Oakeshott and Leo Strauss; The Politics of Rena David McIlwain Book 2019 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), under exc

開(kāi)玩笑

沉思的魚(yú)

裂縫

波動(dòng)

Liberal Education and Classical Republicanism,ining their reasons for insisting on the elevated role of the university, McIlwain defends Oakeshott and Strauss from charges of social elitism and highlights the relevance of liberal education in underpinning political moderation. This involves the comparison of Oakeshott’s “conversation of mankind

defendant

thalamus

BURSA

啟發(fā)

上釉彩

Leo Strauss and Socratism After Nietzsche and Heidegger,al of a global technological society as the result of the failure of Nietzsche’s call for a new Western nobility. Separating Nietzsche and Heidegger from their polemical elevation of courage against Hobbesian fear of death, Strauss emphasized their commitment to the higher nobility of philosophy. Mc

Harridan

Michael Oakeshott and Augustinianism After Hobbes and Hegel,ption of poetic individuality, offering a detailed investigation of how Oakeshott moved between mythology and political theory in combining the thought of Hobbes and Augustine. McIlwain argues that Oakeshott used these two thinkers to separate the human will from the fatalism implied by a completely