Titlebook: Metrics for Process Models; Empirical Foundation Jan Mendling Book 2008 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2008 Business Process Modeling.SA

microbe

書目名稱Metrics for Process Models影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Metrics for Process Models影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Metrics for Process Models網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Metrics for Process Models網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Metrics for Process Models被引頻次




書目名稱Metrics for Process Models被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Metrics for Process Models年度引用




書目名稱Metrics for Process Models年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Metrics for Process Models讀者反饋




書目名稱Metrics for Process Models讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

vasospasm

Jan Mendlingnzüberschreitender Unternehmensaktivit?ten aufgezeigt. Das Strafrecht behandelt insbesondere Umweltdelikte. Die Energiewende und Industrie 4.0 wurden eigens berücksichtigt.978-3-662-50475-8978-3-662-50476-5Series ISSN 0937-7433 Series E-ISSN 2512-5214

項(xiàng)目

Business Process Management,, 257, 49, 213, 233, 170, 407, 415, 199, 405, 447, 227, 408] as well as international professional and academic conference series such as the BPM conference [13, 106, 5, 115, 23], there are several fundamental problems that remain unsolved by current approaches. A particular problem is the lack of r

制度

sultry

衍生

Metrics for Business Process Models,t drive error probability and how we can measure them..In this instance, measurement refers to a process that assigns numbers or symbols to attributes of entities in the real world [124] in order to represent the amount or degree of those attributes possessed by the entities [432, p.19]. This way, m

AVANT

Business Process Management,international market for BPM-related software and services accounted for more than USD $1 billion in 2005 with a tendency towards rapid growth in the subsequent couple of years [457]. The relevance of business process modeling to general management initiatives has been previously studied in the 1990

MOTTO

疲憊的老馬

現(xiàn)存

Metrics for Business Process Models,04] points to the limitations of cognitive capabilities and concludes that humans act rationally only to a certain extent. Concerning modeling errors, this argument would imply that human modelers lose track of the interrelations of large and complex models due to their limited cognitive capabilitie