Titlebook: Metaphor and the Historical Evolution of Conceptual Mapping; Richard Trim Book 2011 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers

incompatible

書目名稱Metaphor and the Historical Evolution of Conceptual Mapping影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Metaphor and the Historical Evolution of Conceptual Mapping影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Metaphor and the Historical Evolution of Conceptual Mapping網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Metaphor and the Historical Evolution of Conceptual Mapping網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Metaphor and the Historical Evolution of Conceptual Mapping被引頻次




書目名稱Metaphor and the Historical Evolution of Conceptual Mapping被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Metaphor and the Historical Evolution of Conceptual Mapping年度引用




書目名稱Metaphor and the Historical Evolution of Conceptual Mapping年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Metaphor and the Historical Evolution of Conceptual Mapping讀者反饋




書目名稱Metaphor and the Historical Evolution of Conceptual Mapping讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

有助于

闖入

誘導(dǎo)

Diachronic Mapping at the Conceptual/Linguistic Interface of the conceptual and linguistic features concerned. The final chapter will deal with the causes of evolution in the form of embodied and cultural influence and their relation to salience and semantic field.

仔細(xì)檢查

Cultural History in the Evolution of Conceptual Mappingeding discussions have tended to divide universal constructs and culture into separate entities. One theory that will be proposed here with regard to the time dimension is that culture and universal theories on human embodiment are very often mixed in mapping procedures. This is in line with ideas proposed by Gibbs (1997: 146):

口訣法

個(gè)人長篇演說

restrain

Semantic Fields and Colourts on diachronic patterns depend on the field we wish to investigate? If this is the case, we need to take particular care in the choice of corpus or, better still, to make a comparison of different fields.

花爭吵

overhaul