Titlebook: Metaphor and Iconicity; A Cognitive Approach Masako K. Hiraga Book 2005 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers Limited 2005

走路左晃右晃

http://image.papertrans.cn/m/image/631691.jpg

geriatrician

https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230510708discourse; grammar; interpret; knowledge; metaphor; play; sound; structure; symbolism

多嘴

Methodological FrameworkMethodologically this study draws on three theoretical traditions in the analysis of iconicity and metaphor: Peircean semiotics, the Lakoff-Johnson-Turner cognitive model of metaphor, and Jakobsonian poetics.

才能

acetylcholine

Introduction that the interplay is particularly foregrounded in the case of poetic texts. By analysing a number of short Japanese and English poems, I will argue against the dominant view of language that sees the linguistic sign as primarily non-iconic or arbitrary. This chapter offers an overview of the issues to be discussed in this study.

中止

Iconicity and Written Languagese that I would like to make regarding iconicity and written language roughly corresponds with these viewpoints: the role of iconicity in the logographic writing system of Japanese; and the re-evaluation of written language in the context of visual graphic communication.

Merited

Evacuate

cleaver

Book 2005 a cognitive perspective. There are various degrees in which metaphor and iconicity manifest themselves, ranging from sound symbolism and parallelism in poetic discourse to word order, inflectional forms, and other grammatical structures in ordinary discourse. The book makes unique contributions to

肉身

Vision as Meaningnd layout, and they all have visual, graphic and conceptual effects. This wider sense of the writing system plays a crucial role in the way a poem is put on the page. Not only does it provide resources for the visual shape and structure of the poem, it can also influence the interpretation of the poem.