Titlebook: Medieval Romance and the Construction of Heterosexuality; Louise M. Sylvester Book 2008 Louise M. Sylvester 2008 construction.dynamics.ero

Aids209

Oversee

expansive

Louise M. Sylvester seriously as an organising framework for professional knowledge, what are the implications for professional education and practice?”A multiplicity of understandings emerge as to what is meant by phronesis and how it might be reinterpreted, understood, applied, and extended in a world radically diff

BRIBE

拋棄的貨物

Introduction,nd her publisher. Edith is being asked to produce books with modern, liberated heroines who have more contemporary (as the publisher sees it) psychosexual dilemmas. Her answer suggests that the publisher has failed to understand the ways in which the gender positionings in the romance genre reflect

CHART

Constructing The Heterosexual Contract,erpretations of sex and gender roles, in particular those prescribed for young women. The cultural narratives of the medieval period are, I think, crucial to an understanding of the conventional positioning of gender roles within heterosexuality. The recategorization of romance as a women’s genre, a

清醒

友好關(guān)系

The Sadistic Hero, this cultural context are seen in the versions of femininity found in the cultural narratives of romance and the law. In this chapter the focus will shift slightly to encompass notions of masculinity and the expectations of male gender roles constructed in and by religious thinking and fictional te

責(zé)任

CRP743

Romance Debased,ntic fiction and the law of rape up to the present day—suggest that explicitly consensual sex is virtually impossible within our cultural constructions of heterosexuality.. The narratives of heterosexual femininity require that women say “no” to offers of sex. This means that the male lover’s task i