Titlebook: Media Representations of Footballers‘ Wives; A Wag‘s Life Jennifer Bullen Book 2014 Palgrave Macmillan, a division of Macmillan Publishers

請(qǐng)回避

書目名稱Media Representations of Footballers‘ Wives影響因子(影響力)




書目名稱Media Representations of Footballers‘ Wives影響因子(影響力)學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Media Representations of Footballers‘ Wives網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度




書目名稱Media Representations of Footballers‘ Wives網(wǎng)絡(luò)公開度學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Media Representations of Footballers‘ Wives被引頻次




書目名稱Media Representations of Footballers‘ Wives被引頻次學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Media Representations of Footballers‘ Wives年度引用




書目名稱Media Representations of Footballers‘ Wives年度引用學(xué)科排名




書目名稱Media Representations of Footballers‘ Wives讀者反饋




書目名稱Media Representations of Footballers‘ Wives讀者反饋學(xué)科排名

Colonnade

Wives in Print,native image of footballers’ wives as sophisticated women with glamorous lifestyles to be aspired to. Both of these have created pervasive discourses about the lives of such women which help to shape both fictional representations and how women represent themselves or attempt to distance themselves from such representations.

未開化

方舟

Carcinoma

Obverse

安裝

Fact or Fiction,e of fictional work has been created about their lives. This chapter will focus on the ITV1 series . (FW) but also acknowledges the emerging genre of ‘wag lit’, including . and . (Kervin, 2007;2008), . by Clare Challis and Fabulous (2008) and . one of a trilogy of novels by Kerry Katona (2008) among

defile

,Auto/biographies — Telling Tales,est in celebrity, alongside the blurring of the public and the private, the commercial market for autobiographies has proliferated to include criminals, sport stars and entertainers (Hammersley and Atkinson, 1995). Now even being associated with a celebrity or a producer of celebrity can be enough t

DUST

,Conclusions — What’s in a Name?,s parts of the media. A seemingly innocuous acronym with a denotative meaning of ‘wives and girlfriends’ has become a powerful signifier of femininity and class — one used both as an opportunity by some women and a weapon of symbolic violence against them. It follows Gill’s (2007) argument that the

訓(xùn)誡