Titlebook: Mechanisms to Enable Follow-On Innovation; Liability Rules vs. Alina Wernick Book 2021 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and The Author(s), un

彎曲道理

教義

MAPLE

insightful

即席

Introduction,not have a distinct legal status under the patent system, which is built under the “one-patent-per-product” presumption and with an aim to prevent purely imitative use of inventions. The book relies on economic analysis of the law and doctrinal legal method to explore whether a patent holder’s exerc

Endemic

神刊

Open Approaches to Innovation,ve Innovation and reviews how they explain the motivations behind giving voluntary access to intellectual property. What qualifies as “openness” differs dramatically between the three theories. On this basis, the open models and the licensing practices they represent are placed on a continuum that r

Anticlimax

不能平靜

Legal Foundations and Sources of Compulsory Liability Rules,more frequent and, being used to exploit inventions created in other countries, also controversial. The Paris Convention, which first addressed the instrument in 1925, left signatory states considerable leeway to enact compulsory licenses—an opportunity often used by developing countries. TRIPS narr

易彎曲

Compulsory Licenses in Patent Law, the market failures that hinder follow-on innovation. Under the TRIPS Agreement, compulsory licenses (Art. 31) are a mechanism distinct from exceptions to patent protection (Art. 30). Of the general and procedural conditions of Art. 31 TRIPS, the requirement of prior effort to obtain a license befo