Titlebook: Measuring National Innovation Performance; The Innovation Union Frane Adam Book 2014 The Author(s) 2014 Country Rankings.Innovation Union S

不能約

ENACT

condescend

Some Comparisons with Other Scoreboards,em, we can see some convergent or similar results, but also quite different rankings and clusterings of countries are not so rare. It is true that these scoreboards are not always directly comparable since they employ different methodology and datasets (as we mentioned in the first and second chapte

引導(dǎo)

On Policy Implications,sers who carefully read the entire report and are aware of the limitations and weaknesses of indicators and databases. On the other hand, a superficial overview of the results can lead to one-sided or even false conclusions.

Habituate

人工制品

Forage飼料

Book 2014y-making bodies to measure national innovation capacity. Given that contemporary societies and economies are to a great extent characterised by the processes of production, dissemination and application (re-combination) of knowledge, the accurate monitoring and measurement of R&D efficiency and inno

elastic

Country Profiles and Patterns Regarding Innovation Performance,ome other data sources areneeded as well as a serious consideration of previous and recent criticism by differentauthors (as shown in the previous chapter). Above all, a more contextuallyorientedanalysis should come to the forefront as it would provide more complexand in-depth insights and conclusions.

秘傳

contradict

Innovation Union Scoreboard: Central Monitoring System for the EU,up until recently, when it was renamed or better said replaced by its follower the Innovation Union Scoreboard (IUS), which is prepared by the Maastricht Economic and Social Research and Training Centre on Innovation and Technology (MERIT), in collaboration with the Commission’s in-house science service—the Joint Research Centre (JRC).