Titlebook: Measurement Uncertainty in Chemical Analysis; Paul Bièvre,Helmut Günzler Book 2003 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003 Accreditation.Ac

DOSE

Should non-significant bias be included in the uncertainty budget?,edure is unbiased and, consequently, the results obtained with this procedure are not corrected for this bias. However, when assessing trueness there is always a probability of incorrectly concluding that the experimental bias is not significant. Therefore, non-significant experimental bias should b

沙文主義

帶子

ALLEY

FECK

,Uncertainty — statistical approach, 1/f noise and chaos,ults and analytical measurements at high data dispersion are considered. They include a symmetry of the concentration scale, low-frequency noise, and nonlinear phenomena in atomization processes and chemical reactions. The relationship of 1/f noise and nonlinear phenomena to uncertainty balance, exp

青春期

Calibration uncertainty,rtainty. A novel approach is introduced and tested on actual calibration data for the determination of Pb by ICP-AES. The improved calibration uncertainty was verified from independent measurements of the same sample by demonstrating statistical control of analytical results and the absence of bias.

Melodrama

反應(yīng)

The use of uncertainty estimates of test results in comparisons with acceptance limits, test result has an uncertainty which should be estimated and stated (e.g. in accordance with GUM). Very often this is not the case. Further, discussions often arise on the issue of how the uncertainty shall be considered in relationship to the acceptance limit. The intention of this note is to desc

SPASM

打折