Titlebook: Mathematics and Politics; Strategy, Voting, Po Alan D. Taylor,Allison M. Pacelli Textbook 2008Latest edition Springer-Verlag New York 2008

Transfusion

https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-77645-3Mathematics; political power; political science; politics; social choice; strategy

BIBLE

RODE

connoisseur

,Yes–No Voting, with quite a different voting situation—the one in which a single alternative, such as a bill or an amendment, is pitted against the status quo. In theses systems each voter responds with a vote of “yea” or “nay.” A . is simply a set of rules that specifies exactly which collections of “yea” votes

CHIDE

abnegate

Conflict,e influenced by those of another. Real-world examples of such conflict situations tend to be enormously complex, and a considerable amount of influential work in political science deals with the analysis of particular conflict situations and the ramifications of literally dozens of subtle influences

phlegm

Fairness,ssue, and is very difficult to define or quantify. Surprisingly, however, a mathematical perspective can help identify what it means for a solution to be fair and offer a variety methods or procedures for achieving a solution in many types of disputes..Another common type of dispute involves fairly

你不公正

Escalation,s race of the 1960s, 1970s, and 1980s, to mention just two. Such escalatory behavior is driven at least in part by a desire to keep previous investments from having been wasted. In this chapter we consider a model of escalatory behavior introduced by the economist Martin Shubik and extensively analy

入會(huì)

DEVIL

,More Yes–No Voting,ter 2 that characterized the weighted voting systems as precisely those that are trade robust (meaning that an arbitrary trade among several winning coalitions can never simultaneously render all of them losing). A natural question suggested by this result is whether trade robustness really needs to