Titlebook: Material Participation: Technology, the Environment and Everyday Publics; Noortje Marres Book 2015Latest edition Palgrave Macmillan, a div

為現(xiàn)場

anthropologist

Engaging Devices: The Inter-articulation of Technology, Democracy and Innovation,relation to material participation. The latter form of involvement as I discussed in Chapter 1, can itself be characterized in terms of the attempt to foreground the role of objects, technologies and settings in the organization of publics. There is also a second, similarly ‘reflexive’, reason why t

angina-pectoris

prostatitis

Eco-homes as Instruments of Material Politics: Engagement, Innovation, Change,uestion of whether these beings qualified as actors (Harbers, 2005; Latour, 1992; Callon, 1986b; Cussins, 1996). They proposed that non-human entities deserved more recognition as constituent elements of social and political life and this recognition was made to hinge on their capacities for action.

高興一回

committed

凈禮

thalamus

Gossamer

,Sustainable Living Experiments or a ‘Coming Out’ for the Politics of Things,pe of diagnosis. This literature draws on the social studies of science and technology to develop a broader analysis of the role of public experiments, tests, trials and empirical presentations in social and political life (Barry, 1998; Girard and Stark, 2007; Rosental, 2005; Latour, 2005b; Muniesa

諷刺

Eco-homes as Instruments of Material Politics: Engagement, Innovation, Change,ent, in particular settings and at certain times. From this vantage point, there is another problem with the debate about non-human agency besides anthropomorphism: it wrongly suggests that the crucial issue is whether nonhumans are ‘naturally’ endowed with capacities for socially or politically sig